PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Medicina0 citationsOpen Access

Differentiating Early Alzheimer’s Disease from MCI Using Comprehensive Semiquantitative Parameters in Dual-Phase Amyloid PET: A Pilot Study

View Full Paper
HCHyung Jin ChoiACA. Jin ChoJYJoung Hyun You

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the ability of dual-phase amyloid PET imaging to differentiate Alzheimer's disease from mild cognitive impairment.
  • Twenty-four participants underwent dual-phase amyloid PET/CT and structural MRI.
  • Semiquantitative parameters such as eSUV, dSUV, SUVR, and SUVdiff were analyzed across cortical regions.
  • Group differences were assessed using nonparametric tests with multiple comparison corrections.
  • Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.
  • SUVdiff demonstrated the highest sensitivity (84.2%) and specificity (80.0%) among the metrics.
  • Several regional parameters showed significant group differences in uncorrected analyses, but none remained significant post-correction.
  • Delayed-phase parameters alone had limited discriminatory power despite observed differences.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Dual-phase amyloid PET imaging has been proposed to provide complementary information regarding amyloid burden and cerebral perfusion. This exploratory pilot study evaluated whether semiquantitative parameters derived from dual-phase PET/CT could differentiate individuals operationally classified as Alzheimer’s disease with mild functional impairment (AD-MFI) from those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Materials and Methods: Twenty-four participants (AD-MFI, n = 19; MCI, n = 5) underwent dual-phase amyloid PET/CT and structural MRI. Early phase SUV (eSUV), delayed-phase SUV (dSUV), standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR), and the difference between early and delayed uptake (SUVdiff) were analyzed across predefined cortical regions. Group differences were assessed using nonparametric tests, with false discovery rate (FDR) and Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple comparisons. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Several regional parameters demonstrated nominally significant group differences in uncorrected analyses; however, none remained statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Among the evaluated metrics, SUVdiff demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 80.0%), followed by eSUV (68.4%, 100%) and MRI cortical volume (47.4%, 100%). Delayed-phase parameters alone showed limited discriminatory robustness despite observed group-level differences. Conclusions: In this exploratory cohort, SUVdiff showed moderate discriminatory potential between AD-MFI and MCI. However, given the small sample size and multiplicity of comparisons, the results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Larger, prospective studies are required to determine the reproducibility and clinical utility of dual-phase semiquantitative parameters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ba0818185d8a398026d5https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030529
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper