PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

White Paper / Preprint Why Mars Colonization Will Fail — And Why Large-Scale Orbital Engineering in the Solar System Must Be Prohibited A Global Complexity–Stability Theory (GCST) Perspective

View Full Paper
RLRoman Lukin

Key Points

  • To evaluate the potential collapse of Mars colonization and the dangers of orbital engineering through the lens of Global Complexity–Stability Theory.
  • Application of Global Complexity–Stability Theory (GCST) to analyze the stability of complex systems.
  • Prediction of Mars colonization failure based on recovery capacity and imposed acceleration rates.
  • Assessment of the risks associated with large-scale orbital engineering on planetary systems.
  • Mars colonization would lead to systemic collapse within 15–40 years due to rapid structural complexity increase.
  • Large-scale orbital engineering could increase risk across systems by 10²–10⁶ times natural levels.
  • GCST estimates risk to Earth at ~5–30% per major engineering experiment, indicating dire consequences.

Abstract

Abstract Global Complexity–Stability Theory (GCST) predicts that any accelerating complex system collapses when the imposed rate of change (α) exceeds the system’s recovery capacity (γ), as formalized by the stability index where C is structural complexity. Mars colonization represents an extreme case of forced acceleration on a planetary scale: human activity seeks to increase C (biosphere, infrastructure, technology) at a rate α ≈ 0. 35 ± 0. 10 yr⁻¹, far exceeding the natural Martian recovery capacity γMars ≈ 0. 05–0. 10 yr⁻¹. This results in GMars ≈ 0. 14–0. 29 << 1, leading to rapid accumulation of irrecoverable structural debt and systemic collapse within 15–40 years of active exponential growth — long before a self-sustaining, multi-generational colony can be established. Large-scale orbital engineering (moving moons, asteroids, or planets) within the Solar System is even more dangerous: such interventions increase α across multiple coupled systems (Earth, Mars, asteroid belt, Jupiter resonances) by 10²–10⁶ times the natural background, while no known mechanism exists to raise γ globally. GCST calculates integrated risk to Earth at ~5–30% per major experiment, with consequences ranging from periodic impacts to long-term biospheric R-collapse. Until planetary-scale protective mechanisms capable of maintaining G ≥ 1 are developed, such activities are equivalent to inducing artificial multi-planetary R-collapse and must be prohibited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roman Lukin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ba1818185d8a39802acehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18974171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper