Therapeutic resistance in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is orchestrated not only by tumor-intrinsic genomic alterations but also by dynamic reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment (TME). This review introduces the tumor-immune spatiotemporal co-evolution paradigm, which reframes mCRPC resistance as an ecosystem-level adaptation unfolding across temporal (disease stage) and spatial (niche architecture) dimensions. We synthesize clinical and multi-omics data to map a probabilistic evolutionary trajectory from an immune-permissive state, through suppressive niche consolidation, to a terminal immune desert phenotype. In this review, we systematically apply the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 criteria to this field, grading all mechanistic claims to explicitly distinguish peer-reviewed, validated findings (Level 1–2b) from speculative hypotheses (Level 3–4), and delineate 5 evidence-graded core conclusions of the tumor-immune co-evolution paradigm. We delineate how spatially organized cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) subsets architect immunosuppressive niches and engage in reciprocal metabolic symbiosis with tumor cells, and redefine therapeutics as dominant selective pressures that drive clonal-stromal co-selection to explain cross-resistance across treatment modalities. To translate this paradigm, we propose an integrative closed-loop “Dynamic Monitoring—Mechanistic Parsing—Synergistic Intervention” framework, with concrete, clinically actionable strategies grounded in 2024–2025 peer-reviewed prostate cancer research. This framework advocates for longitudinal ecological auditing of the TME to rationally guide mechanistically orthogonal combination therapies. Our objective is to provide a rigorously evidence-based roadmap for transforming mCRPC into a chronically manageable condition through precision ecological intervention, offering a novel, actionable perspective to advance prostate cancer immunotherapy and overcome immune evasion for researchers and clinicians in the field of cancer immunology.
Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: