PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Food Protection1 citationsOpen Access

Biocontrol validation of a strictly lytic phage A511 and a commercial phage PGL show reduction of Listeria monocytogenes in raw Scottish Salmon fillet post-harvest

View Full Paper
IMIvy J. MutaiMMMeshach MainaAKAnton Kubala

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the biocontrol potential of bacteriophage A511 compared to commercial phage PGL against Listeria monocytogenes in salmon.
  • Determined lytic spectra of phages using spot assays on 33 L. monocytogenes strains.
  • Evaluated phage growth kinetics using double agar layer methods.
  • Inoculated salmon fillets with L. monocytogenes and applied phages A511 and PGL at different concentrations.],
  • results':['Phages A511 and PGL showed lytic spectra of 97% and 100%, respectively.','Burst sizes were approximately 49 PFU/cell for A511 and 100-200 PFU/cell for PGL.','Significant reductions in L. monocytogenes were achieved, with counts below detection limits after one day at both 4°C and 10°C with 10⁹ PFU/g phage application.']},
  • simple_explanation
  • Bacteriophages, which are viruses that kill bacteria, can help make raw salmon safer to eat. Scientists tested two different phages, A511 and PGL, and found that both were really good at reducing harmful bacteria called Listeria. When they applied the phages in high amounts, they got rid of the bacteria completely within just one day. This matters because Listeria can make people sick, so using phages could be a smart way to keep food safe! 🐟
  • Ephemersised to correctly clarify context and involve contradiction as necessary.

Abstract

Introduction : Listeria monocytogenes is a known food-borne risk associated with ready-to-eat (RTE) foods, including fish. An estimated 90% of cases of invasive human listeriosis result from ingestion of foods containing > 2.0 × 10 3 CFU/g, with growth after purchase being a significant factor. This study aimed to evaluate the biological characteristics, lytic spectra, and determine the biocontrol potential of a strictly lytic L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 in comparison with a commercial phage PGL (P100) on raw Scottish salmon fillets. Methodology : The lytic spectra of phage A511 and the commercial phage PGL was determined using spot assays on a panel of 33 L. monocytogenes strains and phage growth kinetics such as burst and latent period was evaluated using standard double agar layer methods. For the biocontrol study, ∼ 4 log 10 CFU/ml of L. monocytogenes were inoculated on raw Scottish salmon fillets, and the two individual lytic phages (viz., phage A511 and commercial phage PGL) at three phage application rates (final concentrations of 10 5 , 10 7 and 10 9 PFU/g) were used to control experimental Listeria contamination of fresh Scottish salmon fillets stored at 4°C and 10°C. Results : The phages A511 and PGL exhibited lytic spectra of 97% and 100%, respectively, against the strains tested and produced burst sizes of ∼ 49 PFU/cell for A511 and a previously reported range of 100-200 PFU/cell for PGL. There was a significant effect of phage titre (p<0.0001) on the levels of L. monocytogenes with reductions in bacterial numbers to below the limit of detection (i.e., no detectable counts were observed) after 1-day incubations at both 4°C and 10°C for both phage A511 and PGL applied at 10 9 PFU/g, with enhanced reductions at 4°C. Conclusion This study conducted a lab‑scale evaluation of the archival phage A511 on raw salmon in direct comparison with a commercial phage (PGL) under a unified dose–time–temperature framework. To our knowledge, a direct comparison of A511 and PGL on raw salmon using an identical experimental design has not been previously reported. While the findings demonstrate effective reduction of L. monocytogenes under controlled laboratory conditions, further work including broader strain coverage, naturally contaminated lots, sensory and shelf‑life assessments, and multi‑batch validation, is required before commercial implementation can be fully assessed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mutai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb8db39f7826a300bc52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2026.100755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper