PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research0 citationsOpen Access

Adherence to developmental dysplasia of the hip screening guidelines among French healthcare providers: A cross-sectional survey

View Full Paper
CPCorentin PetitpasAix-Marseille UniversitéBFBernard FraisseMBManon Bachy-RazzoukSorbonne Université

Key Points

  • This research aimed to evaluate how well French healthcare providers adhere to screening guidelines for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
  • Conducted a cross-sectional survey with healthcare providers across various specialties.
  • Distributed online questionnaires assessing clinical experience, adherence to guidelines, and training.
  • Analyzed data using descriptive statistics and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.
  • 48% of general practitioners and 72% of community pediatricians adhered fully to national recommendations.
  • Over 50% of general practitioners lacked structured referral pathways.
  • 17% of maternity ward pediatricians started treatment without specialist consultation.
  • 310 DDH cases were diagnosed after 3 months of age among orthopedic surgeons, indicating delays in referrals.
  • More than half of the respondents found undergraduate training inadequate.

Abstract

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains a leading cause of early hip morbidity, and its prognosis depends on timely diagnosis and intervention. Since 2013, a nationwide screening program in France has sought to reduce the burden of late-presenting DDH through standardized clinical examination and risk-based ultrasonography. However, disparities in adherence and implementation have been suspected across various medical specialties. We hypothesized that adherence to the guidelines for early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip differed among practitioners’ groups. A cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the French Society of Pediatric Orthopedics. A structured online questionnaire, adapted to each specialty, was distributed to general practitioners, community pediatricians, maternity ward pediatricians, pediatric radiologists, and pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Questions assessed clinical experience, practice setting, involvement in DDH screening, knowledge and application of national recommendations, referral patterns, and training. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Subgroup comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. A total of 641 respondents participated: 43 general practitioners, 283 community pediatricians, 150 maternity ward pediatricians, 86 pediatric radiologists, and 79 pediatric orthopedic surgeons. While DDH screening was considered a clinical priority by nearly all respondents, substantial variations were observed in adherence to guidelines. Only 48% of general practitioners and 72% of community pediatricians reported full adherence to the national recommendations. Ultrasonography was frequently overused, particularly among pediatricians, often beyond the risk-based indications. Structured referral pathways were lacking in over half of general practitioners and 9% of maternity pediatricians. Notably, 17% of maternity ward pediatricians initiated treatment without prior specialist consultation. Among orthopedic surgeons, 310 DDH cases were diagnosed after 3 months of age, highlighting persistent delays in referral. Undergraduate training was considered insufficient by more than half of the respondents, and postdoctoral training was inconsistently pursued across groups. Despite a well-established national screening framework, DDH diagnosis in France remains fragmented, with inconsistencies in referral practices, overuse of imaging, and gaps in training. Improved interprofessional coordination, standardized referral protocols, and strengthened educational initiatives are urgently needed to reduce late diagnoses and optimize outcomes. IV; Cross-sectional descriptive study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Petitpas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb9db39f7826a300bfa9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104655
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 13D pre-operative planning and patient-specific guides for re-directional peri-acetabular osteotomy in children and adolescents2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2The clinical diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip1987 · 4 citations
  3. 3Pubo-femoral distance: an easy sonographic screening test to avoid late diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip2012 · 43 citations
  4. 4Developmental dysplasia of the hip screening programme in Chile2021 · 8 citations
  5. 5Diagnostic and prognostic values of standard and dynamic ultrasound in early detection and treatment of developmental hip deformity2007 · 3 citations