PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Clinically interpretable nomogram combining body composition and clinicopathological features for one year survival prediction in advanced solid tumors

GBGiulia BruschiFPFrancesco PaoloniFPF. Pecci

Key Points

  • The study aims to create a clinically interpretable nomogram to predict one-year overall survival for patients with advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis on 146 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ICIs.
  • Utilized random survival forest models to evaluate prognostic value of clinicopathological and body composition features.
  • Developed a nomogram combining 12 clinicopathological features and specific body composition metrics.
  • Achieved an average cumulative AUC of 0.73 for predictive performance in the test set.
  • The developed nomogram yielded an overall AUC of 0.76 and mean absolute error in the calibration curve of 0.03.
  • Integrating body composition parameters with clinicopathological features significantly improved one-year survival prediction.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for patients with solid tumors, but reliable predictors of overall survival (OS) are limited. This retrospective study of 146 advanced solid tumor patients treated with ICIs aims to provide a nomogram to predict 1-year (1y) OS integrating body composition (BC) parameters with standard clinicopathological (CP) features. A two-stage approach was implemented: first random survival forest models were trained and tested to evaluate the prognostic value of (a) CP features alone, (b) BC metrics alone or as newly introduced BC scores, and (c) their combination. The best predictive performance (average cumulative AUC of 0.73 in test set) was achieved by combining 12 CP features with the BC score comprising intramuscolar adipose tissue content, visceral fat area index, and the visceral-to-subcutaneous fat area index ratio. Finally, a nomogram was developed with this feature set, offering a tool for personalized risk stratification and treatment planning (mean absolute error in calibration curve of 0.03 and overall AUC of 0.76). Integrating BC parameters with CP features substantially enhances 1y OS prediction in patients receiving ICIs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bruschi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbd5b39f7826a300c4dbhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37510-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences2009 · 2,231 citations
  2. 2Body Composition in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy2024 · 41 citations
  3. 3Informing immunotherapy with multi-omics driven machine learning2024 · 98 citations
  4. 4Clinical and translational attributes of immune-related adverse events2024 · 124 citations
  5. 5Defining clinically useful biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumours2024 · 278 citations