PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Physics in Medicine and Biology0 citationsOpen Access

Detection of errors in organs at risk delineations for radiotherapy for clinical trial reviews

View Full Paper
CDClea DronneCCCatharine H. ClarkXLXavier Loizeau

Key Points

  • This work aims to create a method for measuring variability in organ at risk delineations and detecting errors in radiotherapy planning.
  • Trained a variational autoencoder on a dataset of images and delineations.
  • Reconstructed unseen cases to assess input delineation accuracy.
  • Compared input delineations with reconstructions to identify deviations.
  • Validated findings by evaluating spinal cord and brainstem delineations with known errors.
  • Model effectively detected errors in delineations with minimal changes.
  • Generated distance to agreement maps to quantify disagreements in misclassified areas.
  • Validation of test cases through manual evaluations confirmed the model's accuracy.

Abstract

As part of treatment planning for radiotherapy, the Organs at Risk (OARs) are delineated on the patient's CT scan. This work aims to develop a method to measure variability in OAR delineations and detect errors. Approach. A normative modelling approach was implemented by training a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) on a dataset of images and delineations to model the "acceptable" variability distribution. The trained VAE was then used to reconstruct unseen cases. Disagreements between input and reconstructed delineations highlighted regions where the input deviated from the training distribution. This approach was validated by evaluating the reconstructions of spinal cord and brainstem delineations where common clinical errors had been introduced. Main results. Results showed that the model successfully detected errors, even when only a few voxels or slices were added or removed. Distance to Agreement (DTA) maps were generated to quantify the magnitude of the disagreements in misclassified regions. These results were further validated by manually evaluating some of the test cases. Significance. This tool has the potential of assisting clinicians in reviewing and validating OAR delineations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dronne et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbeab39f7826a300c752https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae50a7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper