PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026International Journal of Hydrogen Energy0 citationsOpen Access

Primary gas standards for the determination of sulfur-based impurities at trace level in hydrogen

View Full Paper
MRMatthias RichterABAnnarita BaldanRBRoel R Beelen

Key Points

  • The research aims to establish primary gas standards for measuring sulfur impurities in hydrogen fuel.
  • Prepared seven sulfur compounds gravimetrically and through dynamic dilution.
  • Validated gas standards in hydrogen and argon matrices.
  • Compared cylinder passivation treatments for stability and reaction prevention.
  • Assessed combined uncertainties against ISO 21087 requirements.
  • Successfully created primary gas standards at concentrations of 4 nmol/mol.
  • Demonstrated equivalence between gas standards with ≤5% relative deviation.
  • Achieved proven stability of standards for 9-12 months.
  • Combined uncertainties met and exceeded ISO requirements.

Abstract

Hydrogen fuel quality needs to comply with ISO 14687:2025 to avoid harmful impact on applications using proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. For total sulfur as one of the most impactful contaminants, an amount fraction of 4 nmol/mol has been set as threshold (so-called Grade D quality). In this study, novel gaseous primary gas standards (PGS) of seven sulfur compounds were prepared either gravimetrically at 1000 nmol/mol, 100 nmol/mol, and 10 nmol/mol, or dynamically diluted down to 4 nmol/mol in hydrogen and argon matrices with relative expanded uncertainties well below 10 % ( k = 2) and proven stability of at least 9–12 months. Two different cylinder passivation treatments were compared, with one treatment identified as unsuitable since reactions took place within the mixture. By performing a cross-check study, equivalence between both sets of PGS could be demonstrated (≤5 % relative deviation for most of the sulfur species). • Primary gravimetric and dynamic gas standards containing seven sulfur species. • Cross-validation comparing standards prepared in different matrices (H 2 and Ar). • Comparison of compound stability in two differently coated gas cylinders. • Combined uncertainties far below requirements of ISO 21087.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc1fb39f7826a300cc79https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper