PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Evaluation of Maintenance Depot Methodologies: A Randomised Field Trial for Risk Reduction in South African Transport Systems

View Full Paper
TMThandiwe van der Merwe

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare traditional scheduled maintenance with predictive condition-based methodologies for risk reduction in transport systems.
  • Conducted a randomised field trial across multiple maintenance depots.
  • Depots were assigned to either control (traditional) or intervention (predictive) groups.
  • Measured risk reduction using a composite safety-performance index over a specified period.
  • Analysis utilized a linear mixed-effects model to assess risk indicators.
  • The predictive maintenance system showed a significant reduction in the composite risk index by 12.7 points.
  • Critical failure events leading to service delays were reduced by approximately 34% in the predictive group.

Abstract

"background": "Maintenance depots are critical nodes for safety and reliability in transport systems, yet systematic evaluations of their operational methodologies are scarce. In the local context, there is a pressing need for evidence-based strategies to mitigate operational risks. ", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two distinct maintenance depot methodologies—a traditional scheduled maintenance system and a predictive, condition-based system—in reducing operational risk indicators within a major transport network. ", "methodology": "A randomised field trial was conducted across multiple depots. Depots were randomly assigned to either the control (traditional) or intervention (predictive) group. Risk reduction was measured using a composite safety-performance index over a defined period. The primary analysis employed a linear mixed-effects model: Y{ij = \0 + \1 Xij + uj +, where Yij is the risk score for depot j at time i, Xij denotes the intervention, and uⱼ are depot-level random effects. ", "findings": "The predictive maintenance system yielded a statistically significant reduction in the composite risk index compared to the traditional system (mean difference: -12. 7 points, 95% CI: -18. 3 to -7. 1). Specifically, the incidence of critical failure events leading to service delays was reduced by approximately 34% in the intervention group. ", "conclusion": "The condition-based predictive methodology demonstrably outperforms the traditional scheduled approach in reducing key operational risks within the studied transport maintenance environment. ", "recommendations": "Transport authorities should prioritise investment in condition-monitoring technologies and data analytics capabilities to enable a shift towards predictive maintenance regimes. Further research should investigate long-term cost-benefit analyses and scalability. ", "key words": "predictive maintenance, randomised controlled trial, transport infrastructure, operational risk, asset management", "contribution statement": "This paper provides the first empirical evidence from a randomised field

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thandiwe van der Merwe (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fc44b39f7826a300cfd6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18973529
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Randomised Field Trial for the Risk Reduction and Reliability Optimisation of Transport Maintenance Depots in Senegal2012
  2. 2Randomised Field Trial of Maintenance Depot System Reliability in Tanzanian Transport Networks2002
  3. 3A Randomised Field Trial Methodology for Evaluating Maintenance Depot Risk Reduction in Ghana2010
  4. 4A Randomised Field Trial Methodology for Evaluating Maintenance Depot Risk Reduction in Ghana2010
  5. 5A Randomised Field Trial Methodology for Risk Reduction in Nigerian Transport Depot Maintenance Systems2017