PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Testicular Echotexture and Scrotal Thermography Before and After Electroejaculation in Beef Bulls

View Full Paper
CPCarlos C. Pérez-MarínLQLuis Quevedo-Sánchez

Key Points

  • To evaluate testicular echotexture and scrotal thermography in beef bulls before and after electroejaculation.
  • Two imaging modalities were utilized: testicular echotexture and thermography.
  • Twelve Limousin bulls aged 12 months to 5 years were studied.
  • Comparison of echotexture values was made before and after semen collection.
  • Testicular echotexture values increased significantly after semen collection (p < 0.01).
  • 41.6% of bulls had low semen quality identified via semen analysis.
  • Thermography indicated a temperature drop of approximately 3 °C post-ejaculation.

Abstract

Testicular echotexture and scrotal thermography were evaluated in beef bulls before and after electroejaculation (EE) to assess their response to semen collection and to standardize echotexture assessment methodology. Twelve Limousin bulls (12 months to 5 years of age) were included in the study. Semen analysis revealed that 41.6% of the bulls exhibited low semen quality. Testicular echotexture values recorded before ejaculation were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than those obtained after semen collection, and differences between testes were observed in some bulls, suggesting reduced reproductive efficiency. For methodological standardization, echotexture values obtained from a single large region of interest were compared with those from six smaller parenchymal regions; the larger region yielded lower pixel intensity values. Echotexture did not differ among imaging planes (proximal, middle, and distal), although probe–testis distance significantly affected measurements. Thermographic analysis showed that the proximal scrotal region was approximately 4 °C warmer than the distal region, and both regions exhibited a temperature decrease of approximately 3 °C following ejaculation. No correlations were identified between semen quality parameters and imaging variables. In conclusion, testicular echotexture increased, whereas scrotal surface temperature decreased after ejaculation. Although ultrasonography and thermography were not associated with semen quality, they provide complementary information for the detection of subclinical testicular alterations. Further studies are warranted to determine whether disparities between testes may serve as indicators of subfertility in bulls.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pérez-Marín et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b5ff8083145bc643d1c364https://doi.org/10.3390/app16062780
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Use of thermography in the long‐term evaluation of scrotal surface temperature and its impact on seminal quality in stallions2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Assessment of testicular echotexture in young boars and its correlation with future semen production2026
  3. 3PS2-6. Effects of Inclusion of an omega-3 Fatty Acid-based Supplement on Thermographic Temperature Measurements and Semen Quality of Beef Bulls2026
  4. 4PSV-15 Evaluating the relationship between subcutaneous backfat thickness and sperm morphology in young beef bulls2024
  5. 5Effects of bull parameters, testicular echogenicity, and scrotal circumference on semen traits2026