PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 20260 citations

Arctic governance: An analysis of a treaty-based cooperation hypothesis

View Full Paper
EKElena Kavanagh

Key Points

  • This commentary assesses the potential for enhancing Arctic cooperation through treaty-based governance.
  • Discussion of cooperation challenges in the Arctic region
  • Analysis of treaty-based cooperation versus soft law
  • Examination of geopolitical tensions and stakeholder interests
  • Treaty-based cooperation is proposed to be more resilient than soft law
  • Procedural justice could be improved among Arctic stakeholders
  • Current geopolitical tensions may hinder the adoption of new treaties

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the method for enhancing cooperation in the Arctic region amidst the challenges posed by global climate change, declining collaboration with Russia, and the growing influence of non-Arctic states such as China. Arctic cooperation can potentially be strengthened by further developing the hypothesis by Timo Koivurova and Akiho Shibata: “Arctic cooperation based on treaties is more resilient than that on soft law.” Treaty-based cooperation has the potential to foster productive intergovernmental dialogue and ensure procedural justice for all stakeholders, even in the event of conflict escalation within and beyond the Arctic region. Negotiation and adoption of new treaties in the Arctic appears decidedly remote in the short-term future, given geopolitical tensions and mistrust among Arctic states. Nonetheless, the prioritization of treaty-based cooperation should be considered for the future models of Arctic Governance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elena Kavanagh (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6068883145bc643d1c86ahttps://doi.org/10.36151/sybil.2024.013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper