PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Eng—Advances in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

A Nanoindentation-Based Study on the Mechanical Properties of Main Rock-Forming Minerals in Granite

View Full Paper
JYJie YaoNanjing Normal UniversityCLChengyu LiuFuzhou UniversityBCBin ChenChongqing University of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize the mechanical properties of main rock-forming minerals in granite using nanoindentation.
  • Conducted systematic nanoindentation tests on individual minerals and mineral interfaces in granite.
  • Characterized elastic modulus, hardness, creep behavior, and fracture toughness of minerals.
  • Analyzed mechanical contrasts and interrelationships among minerals and their interfaces.
  • Quartz exhibits an elastic modulus of 121.9 GPa, feldspar 115.6 GPa, and biotite 66.3 GPa.
  • Mechanical properties are better for quartz and feldspar; biotite shows the weakest behavior.
  • Creep displacement and residual indentation depth are highest in biotite and lowest in quartz.

Abstract

Granite is widely used in buildings, stone carvings, and sculptures, where long-term durability is strongly influenced by the micromechanical behavior of its constituent minerals and mineral interfaces. However, conventional rock mechanics tests cannot resolve the mechanical heterogeneity at the mineral scale, particularly at mineral interfaces. To address this limitation, a systematic nanoindentation study was conducted to quantitatively characterize the elastic modulus, hardness, creep behavior, residual deformation, and fracture toughness of both individual minerals and mineral interfaces in granite, and to clarify their mechanical contrasts and interrelationships. The results show that the constituent minerals quartz, feldspar, and biotite exhibit elastic modulus of 121.9 GPa, 115.6 GPa, and 66.3 GPa, respectively. Quartz and feldspar show relatively better mechanical properties, whereas biotite exhibits the weakest mechanical behavior. Hardness shows the same trend. In contrast, creep displacement and residual indentation depth follow the opposite order, i.e., quartz < feldspar < biotite. In addition, the elastic modulus and hardness of mineral interfaces are lower than those of the adjacent minerals, whereas their creep displacement and residual indentation depth are higher. The dispersion of these micromechanical parameters for mineral interfaces is generally greater than that of the adjacent minerals. The fracture toughness values of both minerals and mineral interfaces were also obtained: mineral fracture toughness ranges from 3.1 to 6.2 MPa·m0.5, while mineral interfaces range from 0.7 to 4.3 MPa·m0.5. Further analysis of the micromechanical parameters indicates that elastic modulus, hardness, and fracture toughness exhibit clear positive correlations among minerals, mineral interfaces, and the mineral aggregate. Comparatively, the correlations are strongest for minerals and weakest for mineral interfaces.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6069b83145bc643d1c96dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/eng7030130
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geomechanical characterisation of organic-rich calcareous shale using AFM and nanoindentation2020 · 80 citations
  2. 2Instrumented nanoindentation and 3D mechanistic modeling of a shale at multiple scales2015 · 232 citations
  3. 3Influence of the Freeze-Thaw Cycles on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Granites2015 · 38 citations
  4. 4Identification of Microstructural Properties of Shale by Combined Use of X-Ray Micro-CT and Nanoindentation Tests2017 · 36 citations
  5. 5Study on mechanical properties of granite minerals based on nanoindentation test technology2021 · 16 citations