PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Radiation Protection Dosimetry0 citationsOpen Access

Survey of radiological optimization processes in Swedish hospitals—similarities and differences between different modalities

View Full Paper
ASAngelica SvalkvistMHMaria HultenmoPJPernilla Jonasson

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore differences in optimization processes between modalities and departments in Swedish hospitals.
  • Questionnaires were distributed to Swedish medical physicists in radiology and interventional radiology.
  • The survey included modality-specific questions about optimization processes.
  • Focus was placed on challenges and factors facilitating effective optimization.
  • Variations were found in optimization processes across different modalities.
  • Successful optimization is harder for stationary and mobile fluoroscopy systems compared to others.
  • Common challenges include limited time and lack of knowledge regarding image quality issues.

Abstract

The optimization process is an important part of image-based diagnostics and treatments, requiring collaboration among medical physicists, radiologists, physicians, radiographers, nurses, engineers, and vendors. However, such teamwork can be challenging in some departments. In spring 2024, questionnaires were sent to Swedish medical physicists working with radiology, interventional radiology, or surgery facilities using radiological equipment. The surveys included modality-specific questions about optimization processes. The aim was to explore differences in optimization processes between modalities and departments, identify common challenges, and understand factors facilitating effective optimization. Results showed variations in optimization processes across different modalities, where successful optimization processes were harder to achieve for stationary fluoroscopy systems and mobile fluoroscopy systems than for the other modalities. Common challenges included limited time and lack of knowledge about image quality issues, while close collaboration, continuous meetings with focus on optimization, and good communication were mentioned as important factors for obtaining successful optimization processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Svalkvist et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6069b83145bc643d1c976https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The use of Dose Management Systems in Europe: Results of an ESR EuroSafe Imaging Questionnaire2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Optimisation of Radiological Protection in Digital Radiology Techniques for Medical Imaging2023 · 32 citations
  3. 3Radiation dose management systems—requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative2020 · 52 citations
  4. 4Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey2008 · 72 citations
  5. 5Cost effectiveness and the role of the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in interventional radiology2020 · 14 citations