PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Cells1 citationsOpen Access

Reliable Radiologic Skeletal Muscle Area Assessment—A Biomarker for Cancer Cachexia Diagnosis

View Full Paper
SASabeen AhmedUniversity of South FloridaNPNathan H. ParkerMoffitt Cancer CenterMPMargaret ParkMoffitt Cancer Center

Key Points

  • The study aims to enhance the assessment of skeletal muscle mass in cancer cachexia using automated methods.
  • Developed SMAART-AI to automate skeletal muscle area assessment from CT images.
  • Evaluated performance across multiple cancer cohorts: gastroesophageal, pancreatic, colorectal, and ovarian.
  • Utilized expert annotations for benchmarking against existing tools.
  • Achieved 97.80% Dice score in gastroesophageal cancer assessments.
  • Median SMA deviation was 2.48% from expert annotations across all tested cancers.
  • Implemented integration with clinical features to enhance survival predictions.

Abstract

Loss of skeletal muscle mass in cancer cachexia is associated with poorer survival, reduced treatment tolerance, and diminished quality of life. Routine oncology computed tomography (CT) can yield skeletal muscle area (SMA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI) for early cachexia assessment and prognostication, but manual annotation is labor intensive and existing automated tools often show inconsistent reliability. We developed SMAART-AI (Skeletal Muscle Assessment—Automated and Reliable Tool based on AI), a fully automated pipeline that localizes the third lumbar (L3) vertebral level, segments skeletal muscle, and quantifies prediction uncertainty to flag potentially unreliable outputs. Performance and reliability were evaluated across gastroesophageal, pancreatic, colorectal, and ovarian cancer cohorts, benchmarking against expert annotations and existing tools. SMAART-AI achieved a Dice score of 97.80% ± 0.93% in gastroesophageal cancer and a median SMA deviation of 2.48% from expert annotations across pancreatic, colorectal, and ovarian cohorts. Uncertainty scores correlated strongly with prediction error, enabling identification of high-error cases to support trustworthy deployment. Integrating the SMA/SMI with clinical features and body mass index (BMI) improved survival prediction (concordance index was +2.19% for colorectal, +9.82% for pancreatic, and +2.58% for ovarian cancer) and supported cachexia detection (70.00% accuracy; F1 80.00%). Overall, SMAART-AI provides an uncertainty-aware, clinically translatable framework for scalable CT-based muscle assessment and improved oncologic prognostication.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahmed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606ea83145bc643d1d6afhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cells15060515
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AI-Assisted Body Composition Assessment Using CT Imaging in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Predictive Capacity for Sarcopenia and Malnutrition Diagnosis2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Artificial intelligence–assisted rectus femoris ultrasound vs. L3 computed tomography for sarcopenia assessment in oncology patients: establishing diagnostic cut-offs for muscle mass and quality2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3Computed tomography (CT)-based skeletal muscle vertebral-related index to assess low muscle mass in patients with non-small cell lung cancer2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4The role of computed tomographic sarcometry data using machine learning technologies in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients with gastric cancer2024
  5. 5Skeletal Muscle Radiation Attenuation at C3 Predicts Survival in Head and Neck Cancer2025