PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases2 citationsOpen Access

Risk of first and second primary keratinocyte cancers in relation to treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with JAKi, TNFi, and non-TNFi bDMARDs—a Swedish nationwide study

View Full Paper
VHViking HussHBHannah BowerMBMartin Björklund

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the risk of primary and second primary keratinocyte cancers in rheumatoid arthritis patients under different treatments.
  • Nationwide cohort study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis
  • Analyzed treatments with JAK inhibitors, TNFi, and non-TNFi bDMARDs
  • Used data from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register and linked cancer data from National Cancer Register
  • Estimated hazard ratios using Cox regression with TNFi as a reference
  • Identified 21,756 patients with rheumatoid arthritis
  • 155 incident keratinocyte cancers in JAKi group, 458 in non-TNFi, and 766 in TNFi
  • HR for JAKi vs TNFi was 1.39, indicating higher risk
  • Increased HR for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma with JAKi
  • Non-TNFi bDMARDs showed no increased risk for keratinocyte cancers

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectives This study aims to assess the risks of primary and second primary keratinocyte cancers (KCs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in relation to treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Methods Nationwide cohort study of patients treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), or non-TNFi bDMARDs, using data from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register linked to other registers including the National Cancer Register, 2012 through 2023. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox regression using TNFi as reference. Results We identified 21,756 unique patients with RA. Based on 155 incident KC with JAKi, 458 with non-TNFi and 766 with TNFi, the HR for JAKi vs TNFi was 1.39 (1.16-1.68), corresponding to 1 extra KC case per every 244 patients per year. For non-TNFi vs TNFi, the HR was 0.96 (0.86-1.08). By subtype, the HR for JAKi vs TNFi was 1.41 (1.13-1.75) for basal cell carcinoma and 1.49 (1.09-2.05) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). For abatacept vs etanercept, the HR for SCC was 1.48 (1.11-1.97). The HR for a second primary KC was 1.31 (0.94-1.82) for JAKi and 0.94 (0.75-1.17) for non-TNFi bDMARD vs TNFi. Conclusions Patients treated with JAKi have an elevated risk of KC compared with patients treated with TNFi. Although the class of non-TNFi bDMARDs is not associated with increased KC risk, we repeated a drug-specific signal of increased risk for SCC with abatacept.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huss et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b64c67b42794e3e660db99https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2026.02.015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rheumatoid arthritis, anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment, and risk of squamous cell and basal cell skin cancer: cohort study based on nationwide prospectively recorded data from Sweden2016 · 124 citations
  2. 2Risk factors for development of new skin neoplasms in patients with past history of skin cancer: A survival analysis2018 · 27 citations
  3. 3Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases or Other Immune-mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2020 · 330 citations
  4. 4Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor therapy and cancer risk in chronic immune‐mediated diseases2012 · 136 citations
  5. 5When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed2013 · 253 citations