PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

A randomized controlled double-blind study on the brain protection of infantile patients with epileptic spasm syndrome through atomized inhalation of hydrogen-oxygen gas

CCChao ChenWHWen HeJCJie Chen

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of hydrogen-oxygen nebulization as an adjuvant treatment for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.
  • Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial
  • Enrolled 53 children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome
  • Compared hydrogen-oxygen inhalation to air inhalation
  • Utilized standard treatment plus interventions over 14 days
  • Assessed clinical endpoints and adverse reactions
  • No significant difference in primary and secondary efficacy endpoints between both groups
  • Higher rates of elevated myocardial enzymes, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and abnormal liver function in the hydrogen-oxygen group
  • Overall safety profiles were comparable without serious adverse events

Abstract

Objective Hydrogen-oxygen nebulization inhalation has a brain-protective effect. This study aims to evaluate its short-term efficacy and safety as an adjuvant treatment for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). Methods A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial enrolled 53 IESS children (Nov 2021–Nov 2023), randomized via a random number table into a hydrogen-oxygen inhalation group (27 cases, 66.6% H₂/33.3% O₂ nebulization) and an air inhalation group (26 cases, medical air nebulization). Both groups received standard treatment plus 4 daily 1-h interventions for 14 consecutive days. Primary endpoints were spasticity relief and effective rates; secondary endpoints included improvements in high-amplitude abnormal EEG, IL-6 levels, respiratory tract infection rate, and adverse reactions. Statistical analyses used SPSS software. Results The primary efficacy endpoints (spasm relief rate p = 0.705, effective rate p = 0.950) and secondary efficacy endpoints (disappearance rate of electroencephalogram hypsarrhythmia p = 0.576, change in Kramer score p = 0.140, change in BASED score p = 0.168, abnormal IL-6 rate p = 0.081) of the two groups of children were compared. There was no statistically significant difference. The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups was comparable, and no serious adverse events occurred in either group. However, the incidences of elevated myocardial enzymes (28.3% vs. 10.9%), gastrointestinal dysfunction (43.5% vs. 23.9%), and abnormal liver function (8.7% vs. 0%) in the hydrogen-oxygen inhalation group were significantly higher than those in the air inhalation group (all p 0.05). Conclusion Short-term hydrogen-oxygen nebulization inhalation failed to significantly improve the clinical efficacy of standard treatment for children with IESS. Although it is generally safe and feasible, its potential effects on myocardial, liver and gastrointestinal functions of children need to be closely monitored. In the future, large-sample, long-term follow-up multi-center studies need to be carried out to comprehensively evaluate its clinical value. Clinical trial registration http://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/home , identifier (ChiCTR2100047479).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79da78166e15b153aadb5https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1781738
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper