PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Results in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

A Framework for Reputation Aware Uninorm-driven Consensus Algorithms for Blockchain Networks

View Full Paper
BRBruno Ramos-CruzJAJavier Andreu-PérezDRDavid Richerby

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a methodology for improving consensus algorithms by integrating reputation management and addressing computational and participatory challenges.
  • Developed methodology based on reputation-aware uninorm-driven consensus algorithms
  • Utilized intuitionistic fuzzy sets to express and manage reputation uncertainty
  • Implemented uninorm aggregation operations for monitoring reputation evolution
  • Defined suitable functions in intuitionistic fuzzy sets and uninorm aggregation for consensus
  • Demonstrated an equitable approach for validator participation in consensus
  • Achieved linear computational complexity without increased communication overhead
  • Showcased improved fairness and inclusivity in blockchain network performance

Abstract

• A methodology for reputation aware uninorm-driven blockchain consensus algorithms • An intuitionistic framework for managing reputation uncertainty • A recovery mechanism reinforcing positive and negative reputation evolution over time • An analysis to define suitable functions in IFSs and UOAs for blockchain consensus The operation of blockchain is governed by consensus algorithms (CA). Several consensus mechanisms require significant computational power, while others necessitate high amounts of stakes to select the participant to validate and verify the transactions in the block, leading to centralisation of power and participant exclusion. This paper proposes a novel methodology to address these issues in reputation-based consensus algorithms by studying the reputation behaviour of the validator using intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and uninorm aggregation operations (UAOs). Our approach uses IFSs to express the “reputation” because the reputation values in a consensus algorithm eventually imply uncertainty, and IFSs facilitate the representation of a lack of precise knowledge about reputation. Moreover, this methodology utilises uninorm aggregation operations to monitor reputation over time and reinforces the importance of negative and positive reputation. Consequently, this solution allows validators to rectify past failures in subsequent verification processes and foster an equitable consensus algorithm design. The proposed framework maintains linear computational complexity and does not introduce additional communication overhead beyond the underlying consensus protocol. Supported by experimental results, our methodology demonstrates improved performance and evaluation, promising advancements in blockchain network fairness and inclusivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramos-Cruz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79df38166e15b153ab31bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109943
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper