PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Journal of Biomechanics0 citationsOpen Access

Hip and knee joint work modulate single-leg lateral jump performance despite the ankle being the primary contributor

View Full Paper
ADAinsley DurninJCJordan Cannon

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how different joints contribute to performance in single-leg lateral jumps.
  • Eighteen female athletes performed maximal-distance single-leg lateral jumps.
  • Full-body kinematics, kinetics, and hip muscle activation were recorded.
  • Joint power and work were calculated through inverse dynamics on linked segment models.
  • Work done on the whole-body centre-of-mass accounted for 68% of the variance in jump distances.
  • Hip and knee joint work were significantly correlated with jump distance, while total joint power underestimated whole-body power by 23%.
  • There was substantial variability in individual hip muscle coordination strategies and contributions to jump performance.

Abstract

Single-leg lateral jumps are a complex, multi-joint and multi-planar task with distinct biomechanical demands compared to vertical and forward jumps, yet they remain relatively under-researched. Their unique demands provide an opportunity to ask mechanistic questions regarding multi-joint control and assess key aspects of athletic performance, but detailed biomechanical descriptions of task performance are lacking. The purpose of this study was to quantify joint contributions to whole-body dynamics and jump distance, and to examine hip muscle recruitment during maximal-distance single-leg lateral jumps. Eighteen female athletes performed three maximal-distance single-leg lateral jumps from each limb while full-body kinematics, kinetics, and hip muscle activation were recorded. Whole-body (WB) centre-of-mass (COM) power and work were computed as the dot product of the ground reaction force and WB-COM velocity. Inverse dynamics analysis on linked segment models calculated joint power and work. Work done on the WB-COM explained 68% of the variance seen in normalized jump distances across participants. Total joint power underestimated whole-body centre-of mass power by 23%. The ankle joint was the primary contributor (p < 0.001) though only hip (R 2 = 0.33, p = 0.01) and knee (R 2 = 0.55, p = 0.0004) joint work scaled with jump distance. Large variability in individuals’ hip muscle coordination strategy and relative hip joint contributions to task performance highlight limitations in relating muscle activation to joint, whole-body, and task performance at the group-level. These findings suggest quantifying segmental power flow and muscle power contributions might provide greater insight into how individuals modulate muscle coordination and multi-joint control to perform single-leg lateral jumps.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Durnin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e398166e15b153ab38chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking2002 · 533 citations
  2. 2Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking1999 · 225 citations
  3. 3Effects of movement for estimating the hip joint centre2006 · 123 citations
  4. 4Different methods to estimate total power and its components during lifting1992 · 22 citations
  5. 5Single-Leg Lateral, Horizontal, and Vertical Jump Assessment: Reliability, Interrelationships, and Ability to Predict Sprint and Change-of-Direction Performance2009 · 262 citations