PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)0 citations

Analytical performance of an automated LC-MS/MS analyzer for determination of vitamin D concentration in blood plasma and serum

View Full Paper
KWKatie WeaverTWTom de WaalMVMichael Vogeser

Key Points

  • Evaluate the analytical performance of the Ionify Vitamin D iPack on the Cobas i 601 LC-MS/MS analyzer for measuring vitamin D levels.
  • Assessed repeatability and reproducibility across three laboratories with five replicates per day for five days.
  • Evaluated accuracy using external quality assessment samples in six laboratories.
  • Compared results of the Cobas i 601 method to a validated in-house LC-MS/MS laboratory-developed test using weighted Deming regression.
  • Coefficients of variation (%CV) for 25(OH)D levels ranged from 2.7% to 4.8%, and 24,25(OH)2D levels from 2.3% to 3.5%.
  • Median accuracy across samples ranged from 89% to 110% of expected values and 92% to 109% compared to the reference method.
  • High correlation (r value 0.984 to 0.995) was found between the Cobas i 601 levels and those from the validated LDT.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Measurement of the concentrations of vitamin D metabolites is clinically important because abnormal levels are associated with perturbations in calcium and phosphorus homeostasis. The objective of this study was to evaluate analytical performance of the Ionify ® Vitamin D iPack that measures 25-hydroxyvitamin D 25(OH)D and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 24,25(OH) 2 D on the Cobas ® i 601 analyzer, an automated liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyzer. Methods Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed in three laboratories (nine samples, five replicates per day for five days). Accuracy was evaluated using three to four external quality assessment (EQA) samples in six laboratories. Finally, the Cobas i 601 method was compared to a validated in-house LC-MS/MS laboratory-developed test (LDT) using weighted Deming regression. Results Across the three sites and reagent lots, coefficients of variation (%CV) for 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH) 2 D levels ranged from 2.7 % to 4.8 % and 2.3 % to 3.5 %, respectively. Accuracy (median recovery for all samples) ranged from 89 % to 110 % of the expected value, and from 92 % to 109 % of the reference method, across six laboratories. 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH) 2 D concentrations measured on the Cobas i 601 system were highly correlated (r value between 0.984 and 0.995, slope 0.913 to 1.027) with those from the validated LDT. Conclusions The Ionify Vitamin D iPack on the Cobas i 601 analyzer is a precise, accurate and reliable method for 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH) 2 D measurement and can support clinical management of vitamin D deficiency and excess.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weaver et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e398166e15b153ab51chttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0057
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The increasing problem of subclinical and overt hypervitaminosis D in India: An institutional experience and review2016 · 44 citations
  2. 2Analytical performance specifications – moving from models to practical recommendations2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3A candidate reference measurement procedure for quantifying serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry2015 · 102 citations
  4. 4Vitamin D Deficiency2007 · 13,719 citations
  5. 5The role of 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D in the mechanism of acquired vitamin D deficiency1992 · 194 citations