PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Prospective Comparative Study of Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix in the Management of Diabetic and Trophic Ulcers

View Full Paper
I(International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR)

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how effective autologous PRFM dressing is compared to conventional dressings in managing diabetic and trophic ulcers.
  • Conducted a prospective comparative study over 18 months
  • Included 100 patients with chronic ulcers divided into two groups: PRFM dressing and conventional povidone-iodine dressing
  • Assessed wound surface area, depth, hospital stay duration, and dressing frequency
  • Used statistical analysis including Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test
  • PRFM group showed a mean percentage reduction in wound surface area of 64.2% versus 49.7% in controls
  • Wound depth reduction was 79.3% for PRFM group compared to 60.4% in controls
  • The PRFM group had a shorter average hospital stay of 10.5 days compared to 20.4 days for controls
  • Fewer dressings were required in the PRFM group (6.32) compared to controls (25.0)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chronic non-healing ulcers represent a significant burden to patients and healthcare systems, particularly in diabetic and trophic ulcers. Conventional dressings often require frequent changes and prolonged hospital stay. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) has emerged as a regenerative modality promoting wound healing through sustained release of growth factors. Aim: To compare the efficacy of autologous PRFM dressing with conventional povidone-iodine dressing in the management of diabetic and trophic ulcers. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted over 18 months (2022–2024) in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 100 patients with chronic ulcers were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (Cases): PRFM dressing (n=50) Group B (Controls): Conventional povidone-iodine dressing (n=50) Patients were assessed for reduction in wound surface area, wound depth, duration of hospital stay, and total number of dressings required. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The mean percentage reduction in wound surface area was significantly higher in the PRFM group (64.2 ± 8.52%) compared to controls (49.7 ± 7.83%) (p<0.001). Mean wound depth reduction was also superior in the PRFM group (79.3 ± 10.1%) versus controls (60.4 ± 12.0%) (p<0.001). The PRFM group had significantly shorter hospital stay (10.5 ± 3.2 days vs 20.4 ± 6.19 days) and required fewer dressings (6.32 ± 1.22 vs 25.0 ± 3.86). Conclusion: Autologous PRFM dressing is a safe, effective, and superior alternative to conventional dressings in chronic diabetic and trophic ulcers, offering faster healing, reduced hospital stay, and improved patient compliance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR) (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e6e8166e15b153abb1bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19015883
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper