PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Kinematic Analysis of Manual, Collaborative and Robotic Surgical Retractor Holding

MZMathies ZehnyJMJ. MeyerNENazila Esmaeili

Key Points

  • This study aims to quantify the kinematic performance of manual, collaborative, and robotic retractor holding in a surgical context.
  • Conducted kinematic analysis using 6-DOF tracking at 80 Hz during ex-vivo porcine liver retraction.
  • Compared position deviation, tremor intensity, and path length across manual, collaborative, and robotic modes.
  • Analyzed effect sizes to evaluate stability and precision differences between systems.
  • Robotic assistance reduced position deviation from 133 mm (manual) to 0.74 mm (99.4% reduction).
  • Tremor intensity decreased by 99.6% with robotic assistance.
  • Path length for robotic retraction reduced from 9.3 m to 0.17 m (98% reduction).
  • Collaborative mode achieved 50% reduction in position deviation and 93% reduction in path length.

Abstract

Surgical retractor stability is crucial for precision and safety. This study quantifies kinematic performance of manual, collaborative, and robotic retractor holding using 6-DOF tracking at 80 Hz during ex-vivo porcine liver retraction. Robotic assistance reduced position deviation from 133 mm (manual) to 0.74 mm (99.4%), tremor intensity by 99.6%, and path length from 9.3 m to 0.17 m (98%). Effect sizes ranged from d=1.03 to d=2.64. Collaborative mode achieved intermediate stability (50% deviation reduction, 93% path reduction) while preserving adjustment capability. Results establish objective metrics for retraction quality assessment and demonstrate that passive robotic assistance achieves submillimeter precision while addressing personnel shortages in open surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zehny et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e968166e15b153ac11fhttps://doi.org/10.18416/automed.2026.2509
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper