PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Physics Intermediate Representation (PIR): A Structured Framework for Automated Physical Law Discovery

View Full Paper
MHMuhammad Hanif

Key Points

  • The research aims to create a structured framework for discovering physical laws from data using the Physics Intermediate Representation (PIR).
  • Formalizes PIR as a six-tuple.
  • Defines a five-stage discovery pipeline: candidate generation, dimensional filtering, coefficient estimation, residual refinement, sparse model selection.
  • Describes five canonical PIR types: Equation, ForceLaw, ODE, Lagrangian, Hamiltonian.
  • PIR is the only framework providing typed output, dimensional consistency, parameter uncertainties, and Lagrangian-type identification simultaneously.
  • Achieved parameter recovery errors below 1.3% in scalar field and classical mechanics problems.

Abstract

Physics Intermediate Representation (PIR) is a structured framework for automated discovery of physical laws from observational data. This paper formalises the PIR object as a six-tuple (expression, variables, dimensional signature, parameters, residual, type), defines a five-stage discovery pipeline (candidate generation, dimensional filtering, coefficient estimation, residual refinement, sparse model selection), and describes five canonical PIR types: Equation, ForceLaw, ODE, Lagrangian, and Hamiltonian. PIR bridges data-driven symbolic regression and downstream scientific reasoning by wrapping discovered expressions in typed, semantically rich objects that carry physical units, fitted parameters with uncertainties, and goodness-of-fit residuals. A comparison table shows that PIR is the only current framework providing typed output, dimensional consistency, parameter uncertainties, and Lagrangian-type identification simultaneously. The framework is grounded in the Neural Lagrangian Series (Papers 1–6), which achieved parameter recovery errors below 1.3% on scalar field and classical mechanics problems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muhammad Hanif (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e968166e15b153ac197https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18995724
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper