Rapid urban densification has intensified the scarcity of urban green space and challenged residents’ health and well-being. Pocket parks, as micro-scale infill green spaces embedded in the urban fabric, are increasingly adopted to expand everyday access to nature. Using three representative pocket parks in Nanjing, China, this study draws on self-reported data from questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize spatiotemporal use patterns and examine their links to perceived psychological, physiological, and social benefits through quantitative statistical analysis and modeling. Results show that pocket park use is highly routinized. Temporal patterns were evident, with weekend and autumn visits associated with improvements in emotional well-being, pain relief, and parent–child interaction. Perceived benefits were generally positive across psychological, physiological, and social domains, with psychological benefits—especially emotional relief and reduced loneliness—reported most strongly. Benefit levels varied across parks and user groups. Mechanism analysis reveals that the park supply factor, reflecting accessibility and basic facility provision, showed the most consistent direct paths to perceived benefits, whereas facility use and length of stay had no significant direct effects. These findings suggest that pocket park planning should prioritize accessibility and adequate basic provision, while strengthening activity support in ways that align with local use rhythms to enhance health-oriented performance in high-density cities.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.