PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Differences in Assessing Loneliness Among Japanese Older Adults: A Comparison of Family Physicians and Nurses

View Full Paper
KYKazutaka YoshidaAGAya GotoIKIchiro Kawachi

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how family physicians and nurses assess loneliness among older adults and to identify differences in their approaches.
  • Conducted two surveys in Japanese family medicine clinics.
  • Survey 1 involved a cross-sectional questionnaire with patients aged ≥ 50 years, family physicians, and nurses.
  • Loneliness assessed using the UCLA Loneliness Scale as the reference standard.
  • Survey 2 utilized an open-ended questionnaire analyzed through quantitative text mining.
  • 38% of surveyed patients were classified as lonely according to the UCLA scale.
  • Family physicians showed higher sensitivity (45.3%) but lower specificity (67.4%) compared to nurses.
  • Nurses exhibited lower sensitivity (21.8%) but higher specificity (84.5%).
  • Text mining revealed family physicians focused on relational quality, while nurses highlighted observable social circumstances.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Loneliness is highly prevalent in Japan and has become a major public health concern. Although primary health care professionals are often the first to encounter lonely patients, loneliness is subjective and difficult to detect in routine clinical practice. This study aims to examine how family physicians and nurses assess patient loneliness, and whether their approaches differ. Methods: This mixed-methods study comprised two surveys administered in Japanese family medicine clinics. Survey 1 (August 2020) was a cross-sectional questionnaire involving patients aged ≥ 50 years (n = 470), six family physicians, and seven nurses, of whom one responded on behalf of the group. Patient loneliness was measured using the UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Loneliness Scale (Version 3) and served as the reference standard. Physicians and nurses independently assessed patient loneliness based on medical records. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. Survey 2 (August–September 2023) used an open-ended questionnaire completed by the same physicians and nurses, with responses analyzed using quantitative text mining to explore assessment perspectives. Results: Based on the UCLA scale, 38% of patients were classified as lonely. Compared to each other, family physicians demonstrated a higher sensitivity (45.3%) but lower specificity (67.4%), whereas nurses showed a lower sensitivity (21.8%) but higher specificity (84.5%). Text mining revealed that family physicians emphasized relational quality and psychological context, sometimes identifying loneliness even when there is no apparent lack of social connections. In contrast, nurses tended to define loneliness in terms of clearly observable social circumstances and emphasized patients’ subjective acknowledgment. Conclusions: Family physicians and nurses employ distinct yet complementary approaches to identifying loneliness in primary health care. Collaborative, role-based strategies may enhance the accurate detection of loneliness and support more effective patient care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoshida et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba431a4e9516ffd37a405bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062255
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper