PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Universal Coherence Leakage: A Structural Bridge between the Gravitational and Electromagnetic Constants in the Projective Dynamic Logo Framework (Version 2, corrected)

View Full Paper
CLCédric Laubscher

Key Points

  • To correct and extend the structural connection between Newton's gravitational constant and the fine-structure constant within the Projective Dynamic Logo framework.
  • Correction of two numerical errors in version 1
  • Replacement of the original bridge formula with a structurally derived expression
  • Prediction of G using a parameter-free approach
  • Comparison of predictions with CODATA 2022 values
  • Corrected values: εG = 0.0075194 and Δrval = 0.047960
  • New prediction of GPDL matches experimental values within 27 ppm
  • No free parameters introduced, indicating robustness of the model

Abstract

This paper presents a corrected and extended version of PDL-D20 (version 1), which established a structural connection between Newton's gravitational constant G and the fine-structure constant α within the Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework. Version 1 contained two numerical errors and a structurally unjustified bridge formula. The corrected values are εG = 0.0075194 (not 0.0073891) and Δrval = 0.047960 (not 0.049751). The original bridge formula is replaced by a structurally derived expression whose three factors encode the hierarchical amplification of the proton architecture, the golden-ratio surface projection, and the no-self-loop coherence constraint on the up-core. Inverting this formula yields the parameter-free prediction GPDL = 6.67448 × 10−11 m³ kg−1 s−2, in agreement with the CODATA 2022 recommended value to 27 ppm and consistent with all current experimental determinations of G. No free parameters are introduced. The prediction is falsifiable and will constitute a decisive test of the PDL architecture when next-generation measurements of G reach the 1 ppm level. Version 2 — March 2026. This version supersedes version 1. Two numerical errors have been corrected (εG and Δrval), and the bridge formula has been replaced by a structurally derived expression with no free parameters. Version 1 is archived for reference but should not be cited for numerical results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cédric Laubscher (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43384e9516ffd37a44e9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19056584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper