PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Journal of the American Geriatrics Society0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Ceiling Fans on Self‐Reported Symptoms and Mood‐State in Bed‐Resting Older Adults Exposed to Indoor Overheating

View Full Paper
GMGregory W. McGarrFOFergus K. O’ConnorGKG. P. Kenny

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how ceiling fans influence self-reported symptoms and mood in older adults during exposure to warm indoor temperatures.
  • Follow-up analysis of a randomized study design with 20 bed-resting older adults.
  • Participants experienced two sessions: one with a ceiling fan and one without.
  • Assessment of heat-related symptoms and mood states using validated questionnaires pre-exposure and post-exposure.
  • Cumulative physiological strain measured via core temperature and heart rate across an 8-hour period.
  • Core temperature increased significantly with no fan use compared to fan use.
  • Total symptom scores were 1.3-fold higher without fan use.
  • Heart rate showed an increasing trend but was not significantly modified by fan conditions.
  • Mood disturbance did not differ between the two conditions, indicating no significant association with physiological strain.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background While fans are recommended for cooling at temperatures ≤ 40°C, the extent to which ceiling fans mitigate perceptual and physiological strain in older adults exposed to warm indoor environments (~31°C 87.8°F) remains unclear. Methods This follow‐up analysis of our randomized study used validated questionnaires to evaluate effects of ceiling fans on self‐reported heat‐related symptoms (68‐item Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire; ESQ‐IV) and mood‐state (40‐item Profile of Mood States questionnaire; POMS‐40) in bed‐resting older adults during indoor overheating (8 h; 31°C (87.8°F), 45% relative humidity). Twenty participants (median age interquartile range: 71 68–73 years; 12 females) completed two sessions with a ceiling fan set to 0 m/s (control) or ~1.5 m/s (fan). Perceptual outcomes (ESQ‐IV, POMS‐40) were assessed pre‐exposure and at end heating. Cumulative physiological strain was assessed using area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC) values for core temperature and heart rate over hours 0–8. End heating perceptual scores were evaluated using linear mixed‐effects models adjusted for pre‐exposure scores and fan condition (with/without each physiological strain index). Results Core temperature and heart rate increased 0.15 0.06, 0.24°C (0.27 0.11, 0.43°F; p = 0.003), and 1.5 0.5, 3.4 bpm ( p = 0.135) per hour, respectively, with no‐fan compared with fan use. After adjusting for core temperature AUC ( p = 0.233), total symptom scores were 1.3‐fold 1.1, 1.7 higher with no‐fan ( p = 0.015). Heart rate AUC did not modify this effect ( p = 0.215); however, greater heart rate AUC was independently associated with higher symptom scores ( p = 0.042). Mood disturbance did not differ between fan conditions and was not significantly associated with physiological strain markers (all p ≥ 0.187). Conclusions Ceiling fans alone do not fully mitigate perceptual or physiological strain in older adults exposed to prolonged indoor overheating. Nonetheless, a “fan‐first” strategy integrating fan use with ambient cooling may offer an accessible, energy‐efficient approach to enhance heat‐health protection in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06142890

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McGarr et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43694e9516ffd37a4906https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70388
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper