PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Breaking barriers: A study protocol on unveiling gender, racial and other intersectional dynamics in post-secondary institutions and identifying solutions for advancing primary care and public health research

View Full Paper
MAMonica AggarwalUniversity of TorontoSWSabrina T. WongUniversity of British Columbia
Andrea C. Tricco
Andrea C. TriccoSt. Michael's Hospital

Key Points

  • This research aims to uncover the barriers faced by racialized women in academia and provide solutions to promote equity and inclusion.
  • Adopts a sequential mixed-methods approach
  • Collects demographic data through a quantitative survey and existing datasets
  • Investigates workplace discrimination and departmental satisfaction
  • Conducts interviews with EDI leaders and academic researchers
  • Uses inductive and deductive data analysis methods
  • Profiles disparities in positions and leadership roles among PC and PH academics
  • Explores intersectional challenges faced by racialized women in their career progression
  • Identifies preliminary findings for equity-promoting strategies
  • Informs effective interventions to enhance diversity and support in academia

Abstract

Background and objectives This study protocol employs critical race and intersectionality theories to investigate barriers faced by racialized women at various academic career stages within Canadian primary care (PC) and public health (PH). The objectives are to identify faculty characteristics, examine intersectional barriers, and recommend equity-focused, inclusive strategies and policies. Research design and methods The study adopts a sequential mixed-methods approach. A quantitative survey and/or existing datasets will be used to collect demographic data on PC and PH academic position holders in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada. Data will also examine experiences of workplace discrimination; equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) resource use; and departmental satisfaction. Subsequently, we will conduct interviews with researchers and leaders who are responsible for hiring and involved in or addressing matters related to EDI. Inductive and deductive approaches will be used to analyze the data in accordance with theoretical frameworks to deepen insights into equity and inclusion in academia. Results The quantitative phase will profile PC and PH academic position holders, highlighting disparities in positions and leadership roles. The qualitative study will explore intersectional challenges faced by racialized women academic position holders during career progression. Preliminary findings will inform effective equity-promoting strategies. Discussion and implications This study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on gender and racial inequities in academia by uncovering systemic identity-based disparities in the careers of PC and PH researchers in Canada. The findings will inform the development of targeted interventions to promote equitable hiring, faculty support, and leadership advancement, enhancing diversity and productivity through an inclusive and equitable academic environment. Findings will be shared via publications, policy briefs, workshops, and online platforms to engage academics, advocacy groups, funders and policymakers in promoting equity and driving institutional change in PC and PH research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aggarwal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb928c496e729e6297fdfahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344467
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention2022 · 249 citations
  2. 2Assessing the impact of Canadian primary care research and researchers2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Women, Men, and the Academic Hierarchy: exploring the relationship between rank and sex1992 · 24 citations
  4. 4Women Leadership in Academia: Barriers, Mentoring, and Resiliency among Different Ethnic Groups2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5How do you define and measure research productivity?2014 · 319 citations