PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Energy Conversion and Management3 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced methane production and ammonia inhibition mitigation in intensified anaerobic digestion of high nitrogen biosolids: ex-situ vacuum stripping versus thermal hydrolysis

View Full Paper
AKAli KhadirEJEunKyung JangDSDomenico Santoro

Key Points

  • The objective is to compare methane production and ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion using ex-situ vacuum stripping and thermal hydrolysis.
  • Compared the integrated thermal hydrolysis-anaerobic digestion (THP-AD) with vacuum-enhanced anaerobic digestion (IC-AD).
  • Maintained identical organic loading rates of 8–8.7 kgCOD/m3·d and solids retention times of 18–20 days.
  • Assessed methane yield, ammonia levels, and microbial community structures.
  • IC-AD achieved stable methane yield of 0.22 L-CH4/gCOD fed (55% COD destruction) compared to <0.1 L-CH4/gCOD fed in THP-AD.
  • IC-AD reduced digester ammonia by 49%-56%, while THP-AD showed ammonia accumulation.
  • Methanogen counts were 6.2 times higher in IC-AD, dominated by Methanosarcinaceae compared to Methanobacteriaceae in THP-AD.

Abstract

• Ex-situ vacuum-AD showed stable methane production compared to integrated thermal hydrolysis −AD. • Ammonia and propionate accumulation led to failure of the integrated thermal hydrolysis-AD. • Biokinetic activities were improved under ex-situ vacuum-AD compared to integrated thermal hydrolysis-AD. • Methanosarcinaceae dominated vacuum-AD, while Methanobacteriaceae dominated thermal hydrolysis-AD. • Ex-situ vacuum-AD showed higher methanogens resistance to ammonia inhibition compared to thermal hydrolysis-AD. This study compares integrated thermal hydrolysis-anaerobic digestion (THP-AD) with the IntensiCarb TM (IC) vacuum-enhanced AD (IC-AD) of mixed primary and secondary sludges under identical organic loading rates (OLR) of 8–8.7 kgCOD/m 3 ·d and solids retention times (SRT) of 18–20 d. IC-AD achieved a stable methane yield of 0.22 L-CH 4 /gCOD fed (55% COD destruction), while THP-AD produced 3.3 gN/L) and propionate (>2.8 g/L) accumulation when using both acclimatized and unacclimatized THP biomass. The IC-AD reduced digester ammonia by 49%-56% via ex-situ vacuum application whereas in THP-AD, ammonia accumulated. Off-line batch tests showed acetate, butyrate and propionate degradation rates were 2.3–2.7 times higher in IC-AD than THP-AD. Ammonia inhibition batch tests showed methane production rate reductions of 27% in IC and 58% in THP at 2–4 g-ammonia/L, highlighting the higher inhibition threshold of the IC biomass. The microbial communities showed distinct differences: IC-AD was dominated by Firmicutes with enriched Petrimonas and Syntrophomonas , while THP-AD was dominated by Bacteroidota with enriched Corynebacterium and Syntrophomonas . Methanogen counts were 6.2 times higher in the IC-AD due to the presence of high-growth-rate acetoclastic Methanosarcinaceae while hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriaceae were the most abundant methanogen in the THP-AD. In offline tests with acetate, the biomass-specific methane production rate in the IC-AD was 8.4 times higher, suggesting that the acetoclastic pathway associated with Methanosarcinaceae provided superior process performance to the hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriaceae pathway. Overall, when operated at similar loadings IC-AD outperformed THP-AD, achieving stable methane production and enriched beneficial microbial communities while also recovering ammonia as an additional value-added product.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khadir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92ae496e729e6298026ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121366
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper