PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026European Journal of Neuroscience1 citationsOpen Access

Corticocerebellar Effective Connectivity During Adapting to vs. Ignoring Delayed Visual Movement Feedback

View Full Paper
ZWZhenyu WangJLJakub Limanowski

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how cortical and cerebellar interactions change during visuomotor adaptation versus ignoring visual feedback.
  • Conducted a virtual reality hand-target matching task with delayed visual feedback.
  • Utilized dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to analyze regional connectivity during different task conditions.
  • Measured hemodynamic responses in specific brain areas (cerebellum, V5, intraparietal sulcus) during tasks.
  • Observed increased hemodynamic responses in the cerebellum, V5, and IPS during adaptation.
  • Found heightened excitatory influence from the right cerebellum on V5 and bilateral IPS during adaptation.
  • Identified increased mutual excitation between the right cerebellum and left IPS specifically in the adaptation condition.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Internal models in the brain may enable flexible action control by calculating estimates of the body's state and predictions of the sensory consequences that its actions will produce. These processes are thought to be implemented by interactions among cortical and subcortical brain regions including the cerebellum. During a virtual reality based hand‐target matching task, in which delayed visual movement feedback was behaviorally relevant (i.e., requiring visuomotor adaptation) or irrelevant (i.e., needed to be ignored), we had observed increased hemodynamic responses in the cerebellum (left Crus I/right Lobule VI), V5, and intraparietal sulcus during the adaptation condition. These activity changes suggested processes specific to delay‐dependent adaptation. Here, we used dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to test if these regional activity changes could be explained in terms of task (i.e., adaptation)‐dependent between‐region connectivity changes. During visuomotor adaptation, DCM revealed an increased excitatory influence of the right cerebellum (Lobule VI) on bilateral V5 (and on the IPS), and an increased mutual excitation among the right cerebellum and the left IPS. Our results support the idea that the communication of cerebellar predictions to the cortical visuomotor network underlies visuomotor adaptation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92ae496e729e629802d5https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70397
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper