PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Journal of Clinical Hypertension0 citationsOpen Access

TREAT: A Multicentre Cross‐sectional TReatment Evaluation of Apparent Resistant hyperTension in Belgium

View Full Paper
BSBrouwers SofieHJHuart JustineCMChabot Mathilde

Key Result

True resistant hypertension was confirmed in 21.9% of patients with apparent resistance, while 75% had pseudo-resistance mainly due to suboptimal dosing and underuse of triple combination therapy.

Key Points

  • To estimate the prevalence of true resistant hypertension and identify factors influencing pseudo-resistant hypertension in Belgium.
  • Single-visit, multicentric, non-interventional, and cross-sectional survey design.
  • Included patients over 18 years on three or more antihypertensive medications.
  • Evaluated therapeutic adherence and availability of blood pressure recordings.
  • 21.9% of patients were estimated to have true resistant hypertension.
  • Only 56.7% were treated with the recommended triple combination therapy.
  • 20% reported poor or moderate therapeutic adherence.

Structured PICO

P
Population
201 adults (>18 years) receiving 3 or more antihypertensive molecules and referred to specialized hospital centers for apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH) in Belgium.
O
Outcome
Prevalence of true resistant hypertension and determining factors of pseudo-resistant hypertension

Most cases of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension are actually pseudo-resistant, primarily driven by the underuse of guideline-recommended triple combination therapy and suboptimal dosing.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The goal of the TREAT study is to estimate the prevalence of true resistant hypertension in a Belgian setting of patients with apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH) and to evaluate which determining factor of pseudo‐resistant hypertension contributes the most to this prevalence. TREAT is a single‐visit, multicentric, non‐interventional, cross‐sectional survey. Inclusion criteria included: patients over 18 years receiving 3 or more antihypertensive molecules and referred to specialized hospital centers for aTRH. A total of 201 eligible patients were included. Only 56.7% of the patients were treated with the guideline recommended triple combination therapy (i.e. renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor, calcium channel blocker and thiazide (‐like) diuretic), and only 23.4% were treated with the maximal recommended dose. WCH was present in 8.7% of the 115 patients with available ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Therapeutic adherence was self‐reported as good by 80% of patients, while 20% reported poor or moderate adherence. In this cohort, the prevalence (95% CI) of true resistant hypertension was estimated at 21.9% (14.7%–30.6%). Among patients referred to specialized centers for aTRH, about 3 out of 4 presented with pseudo‐resistant hypertension. The occurrence of WCH and poor adherence appeared rather limited in our study, but half of the participants were polymedicated with non‐recommended combinations of antihypertensive molecules. Inadequate dosing was observed in the majority of patients and a third was not using a single pill combination. Hence, pseudo‐resistant hypertension seems to be mainly associated with the underuse of triple combination therapy and, most likely, with suboptimal dosing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sofie et al. (2026) studied this question. True resistant hypertension was confirmed in 21.9% of patients with apparent resistance, while 75% had pseudo-resistance mainly due to suboptimal dosing and underuse of triple combination therapy.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92df496e729e629807f2https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.70230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper