PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Supportive Care in Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Implementation of an electronic registry to monitor quality of care for febrile episodes in pediatric patients with cancer in Central America and the Caribbean

JLJacqueline LevyDEDora EstripeautHMHilmarie Muniz-Talavera

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the implementation of an electronic registry to track quality indicators for febrile episodes in children with cancer.
  • Introduced the Global Fever Registry at six hospitals in Central America and the Caribbean.
  • Collected data on febrile episodes over two years from 472 children.
  • Analyzed delays in data entry and completion of data fields through descriptive analysis.
  • Conducted audits at 14 and 24 months to evaluate data completeness.
  • Recorded 619 febrile episodes with a median delay in data entry exceeding 30 days across all sites.
  • Achieved 89% completion of required fields at both 14 and 24 months post-activation.
  • Two centers experienced delays of over 4 months, with one discontinuing use due to challenges.

Abstract

Standardized quality metrics are critical to evaluate guideline adherence and outcomes, yet these are rarely tracked outside of time-limited research studies in resource-constrained settings. We describe the early implementation of the Global Fever Registry (FEVEREG), an electronic registry designed to collect local quality indicators and support implementation of a clinical guideline for fever with neutropenia in children with cancer. Between 2021 and 2023, the registry was introduced at six referral hospitals in Central America and the Caribbean. We assessed the feasibility of a cohort-based implementation model through descriptive analysis of the duration of key implementation steps, delays in data entry, completion of required data fields, and center participation. Over 2 years, 619 febrile episodes from 472 children were recorded. The all-site median delay from episode onset to database entry was over 30 days, but two centers had median delays of > 4 months; one subsequently discontinued registry use. Audits at 14 and 24 months after registry activation demonstrated 89% completion of required fields at both time points. A heterogeneous group of centers successfully implemented a common registry and achieved high data completeness. However, workforce shortages and competing clinical demands contributed to intermittent registry use and delayed entry, highlighting the need for institutional investment in data management. Registry data have already informed local quality improvement projects; future work should identify factors that sustain long-term use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Levy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9321496e729e62980fe2https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10539-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper