PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Assistive Technology0 citations

Classification and characterization of user groups for wearable fall protection systems: A scoping review

View Full Paper
YLYuzi LuoSeoul National UniversityJPJuyeon ParkSeoul National University

Key Points

  • This review aims to classify users of wearable fall protection systems and understand their unique characteristics and needs.
  • Conducted a literature search across multiple databases including IEEE Xplore and PubMed.
  • Identified 40 eligible studies from 2014 to 2024 according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
  • Categorized users into five main groups with their sub-groups.
  • Analyzed differences in fall-risk profiles and technological needs among identified user groups.
  • Identified five user groups, including general users, occupational workers, and patients with mobility issues.
  • Found significant differences in fall-risk profiles and activity patterns among groups.
  • Highlighted a mismatch between user needs and existing research focus.
  • Noted a predominance of studies concentrating on older adults within the healthy population.

Abstract

Wearable fall protection systems (WFPSs) effectively mitigate fall-related injury risks. However, varying application contexts and user characteristics create distinct demands for these assistive technologies. This review investigates the current research status and identifies the key characteristics to classify WFPS users. A literature search across IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases (2014-2024) yielded 40 eligible studies, selected following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. These studies emphasize the importance of addressing user-specific needs and optimizing technology to enhance usability. Five user groups and their sub-groups were identified, including general users, occupational workers, patients with mobility-impairing chronic diseases, people with disabilities, and wearable exoskeleton robot users. Most studies focused on older adults within the healthy population, with comparatively limited research on disease patients, occupational workers, people with disabilities, and wearable exoskeleton robot users. Significant differences in fall-risk profiles, activity patterns, and technological needs were found among user groups, which affect the effectiveness and acceptance of WFPSs. This review highlights a mismatch between user needs and the distribution of existing research efforts, summarizes challenges across different user groups, and informs future work toward more usable and adaptable systems in real-world contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be35166e48c4981c67339chttps://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2026.2634721
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Falls in people with mobility limitations: a cross-sectional analysis of a US registry of assistive device users2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2EMG-based prediction of step direction for a better control of lower limb wearable devices2024 · 15 citations
  3. 3Enhancing fall risk assessment: instrumenting vision with deep learning during walks2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Latest Research Trends in Fall Detection and Prevention Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review2021 · 248 citations
  5. 5The Role of Higher-Level Cognitive Function in Gait: Executive Dysfunction Contributes to Fall Risk in Alzheimer’s Disease2007 · 338 citations