PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Molinero Match — The erfc Fixed-Point Prediction of 20.949% Intermediate-Ice and Its Agreement with Moore & Molinero (Nature, 2011) (Leveille Framework, Paper 56)

View Full Paper
ALAnderson leveille

Key Points

  • The central aim is to compare the erfc fixed-point prediction of intermediate-ice with observed data.
  • Derivation of the erfc fixed-point equation with a single positive solution.
  • Use of the golden ratio as the only input.
  • Molecular dynamics simulation with 32,768 water molecules examining phase transitions.
  • Comparison with existing literature and sensitivity analysis of predictions.
  • Erfc prediction of 20.949% intermediate-ice closely matches the Molinero result (~20%).
  • The prediction succeeds under defined conditions and can be replicated with larger molecular simulations.

Abstract

The erfc fixed-point equation derived in Papers 49–54 of this framework has exactly one positive solution: η* = 0. 20949 (20. 949%). This equation contains no free parameters — its only input is the golden ratio φL = 1. 6180339887. Moore and Molinero (Nature, 2011) performed molecular dynamics simulation of 32, 768 mW water molecules undergoing the liquid-ice phase transition and found, using the CHILL structural classification algorithm, that approximately 20% of molecules in low-density amorphous ice exist as intermediate-ice — four-coordinated but lacking long-range crystalline order. The Leveille prediction of 20. 949% matches the Molinero result within the precision of their reported value (~20%). This paper presents the match, the complete calculation, the sensitivity analysis, supporting literature from Cantrell et al. (2011), Bertolini et al. (1985), Kostinski & Cantrell (2008), and Fukuta & Gramada (2003), and the explicit conditions under which this prediction succeeds or fails. A high-precision replication of the Moore & Molinero simulation with >100, 000 molecules reporting the intermediate-ice fraction to 4+ significant figures is the path to confirmation or falsification. The Leveille Framework is grounded in the principle Δ > 0.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anderson leveille (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38906e48c4981c679116https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19100753
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the melting points of the TIP4P/2005 and TIP4P/Ice water models using particle mesh Ewald for dispersive interactions2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Density Isobar of Water and Melting Temperature of Ice: Assessing Common Density Functionals2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3The Effective Fragment Molecular Orbital Method: Achieving High Scalability and Accuracy for Large Systems2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Density isobar of water and melting temperature of ice: Assessing common density functionals2024 · 16 citations
  5. 5Molecular Dynamics of Ice Ih Impacts on FCC Metals: Interfacial Melting and an Anti-Icing Index of Merit2026