PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Ecological Economics0 citationsOpen Access

Stringency of family firms and owner-managers in the transition to low-carbon emissions

View Full Paper
MBMorten BennedsenJDJohn A. DoukasHGHalit Gonenc

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how family ownership and management influence market perceptions of carbon emissions.
  • Analyzed a sample of 435 publicly listed firms from 14 Western European countries
  • Focused on the period from 2010 to 2020
  • Examined differences in stock returns and market valuations based on family versus non-family management
  • Higher emissions correlate with higher stock returns but lower market valuations associated with carbon risk premiums
  • Family firms led by family CEOs experience greater carbon risk premiums and valuation discounts
  • Investor confidence decreases in family-run firms regarding carbon transition risk management post-2015 Paris Agreement

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between carbon emissions and stock returns, with a focus on the role of family ownership and management. Using a sample of 435 publicly listed firms from 14 Western European countries over the period 2010–2020, we explore whether financial markets perceive family-controlled firms, particularly those led by family-member CEOs, differently in terms of their commitment to sustainable practices. Consistent with prior research, our results indicate that firms with higher emissions earn higher stock returns while simultaneously experiencing lower market valuations, consistent with the presence of a carbon risk premium driven by elevated carbon transition risk. Crucially, we find that family firms led by family CEOs experience significantly greater carbon risk premiums and more pronounced valuation discounts compared to non-family firms and family firms led by professional CEOs. This differential is particularly pronounced in the period following the 2015 Paris Agreement, which heightened investor awareness of climate-related risks. This evidence is consistent with investors exhibiting lower confidence in the effectiveness of carbon transition risk management in family firms led by family CEOs. We attribute these findings to weaker governance, lower institutional oversight, and control-driven decision-making. This study advances the literature on ownership structure by elucidating how family control influences corporate responses to environmental pressures and by highlighting the financial implications of delayed climate action in family-controlled businesses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bennedsen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38b56e48c4981c679586https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.108997
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper