PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026Current Cardiology Reviews2 citations

Inflammatory Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease: Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential?

View Full Paper
RGRahul GhelaniBABashir AlaourKing's College London

Key Points

  • To evaluate the role of inflammatory biomarkers in assessing coronary artery disease across various clinical scenarios.
  • Conducted a structured literature search using Embase, employing MeSH terms and keywords.
  • Utilized Boolean operators and wildcards for refining results.
  • Performed sub-analyses on recent and foundational studies.
  • Biomarkers evaluated include C-reactive protein, Fibrinogen, and those in research like Galectin-3 and Myeloperoxidase.
  • Inflammatory biomarkers may enhance coronary disease assessment despite lacking established diagnostic roles.
  • Potential exists for improved risk stratification and prediction of cardiovascular events.

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. Advances in treatment have resulted in a new, growing cohort of patients who require lifelong management. Although inflammation is firmly established as a driving force across all stages of atherosclerosis, the potential role of inflammatory biomarkers in improving disease prediction, phenotyping, and risk stratification remains uncertain and continues to be debated. Objectives: To examine the current evidence surrounding inflammatory biomarkers that demonstrate potential utility in the assessment of CAD across three key domains: (i) predicting incidence of CAD in asymptomatic individuals; (ii) predicting plaque rupture in patients with established CAD; and (iii) forecasting recurrent cardiovascular events and relevant adverse clinical outcomes, following an acute coronary syndrome. Methods: We undertook a structured literature search using Embase (OVID), combining relevant MeSH terms and keywords. Boolean operators, truncation, and wildcards were used to further refine results, with sub-analyses undertaken on both recent (≤5 years) and earlier foundational studies. Results: Biomarkers critically assessed range from established agents such as C-reactive protein and Fibrinogen to those currently utilised in a research capacity, including Interleukin-6, Galectin-3, Myeloperoxidase, and Tumour necrosis factor-alpha. We additionally discuss the conceivable clinical translation of each biomarker in the context of any key barriers to use. Discussion and Conclusions: Inflammatory biomarkers have the potential to improve coronary disease assessment, but do not currently hold an established place in the diagnosis, risk stratification, or prognostication of disease. Validating their clinical applications along different phases of the atherosclerotic process remains a distant but worthwhile target.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghelani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf3955c7b3c90b18b43ca4https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403x457005260226155043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Emerging Novel Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management: Insights and Future Directions2026 · 5 citations
  2. 2Imaging and Targeting Coronary Artery Inflammation2020 · 10 citations
  3. 3Future Biomarkers for Detection of Ischemia and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome2005 · 430 citations
  4. 4A Multi-Biomarker Approach to Increase the Accuracy of Diagnosis and Management of Coronary Artery Disease2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Clinical Usefulness of Novel Serum and Imaging Biomarkers in Risk Stratification of Patients with Stable Angina2014 · 7 citations