PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026PLoS ONE1 citationsOpen Access

The association between dietary inflammatory index and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JLJingjing LinMHMengna HuangLSLina Shen

Key Points

  • This review aims to clarify the relationship between the dietary inflammatory index and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
  • Systematic literature search in multiple databases conducted until July 2025.
  • Random-effects model used for analysis, calculating odds ratios and confidence intervals.
  • Sensitivity and subgroup analyses performed to identify sources of heterogeneity and assess publication bias.
  • Eighteen studies with 262,468 participants revealed a significant association between dietary inflammatory index and NAFLD (OR = 1.33).
  • A significant association was also found between the dietary inflammatory index and fibrosis (OR = 1.36).
  • Subgroup analyses identified geographic region and diagnostic criteria as sources of heterogeneity.

Abstract

Background The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is a literature-based tool designed to predict inflammation. Previous studies suggest a potential association between the DII and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the relationship between the DII and both the incidence and progression of NAFLD remains unclear. Methods Systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2025. A random-effects model was applied, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity, while Egger’s test was used to assess publication bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.0 were employed for statistical analysis. Results Eighteen studies involving 262,468 participants were included. The data indicated a significant association between the DII and NAFLD (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.23–1.44; P < 0.00001) and between the DII and fibrosis (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.20–1.54; P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis identified geographic region and diagnostic criteria as sources of heterogeneity. Egger’s test revealed publication bias for NAFLD. Conclusion A high DII was associated with an increased risk of NAFLD and an increased risk of progression to fibrosis. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, identifier CRD42025632168.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf3955c7b3c90b18b43cd0https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345297
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper