PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026The Breast0 citationsOpen Access

Clinical effect of bisphosphonate in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: A nationwide real-world data analysis

WCWonseok ChoiMKMinwoong KangKLKyoungmin Lee

Key Points

  • This analysis investigates the effects of bisphosphonate use on survival and fracture outcomes in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer patients.
  • Identified 52,599 women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer from national cancer registry data.
  • Defined bisphosphonate users as those receiving treatment for one year post-diagnosis.
  • Assessed overall survival, recurrence-free survival, fracture incidence, and fracture-free survival.
  • Applied multivariate Cox models and age stratifications in analyses.
  • Bisphosphonate use significantly improved overall survival among patients.
  • Patients aged 60 and older experienced notable benefits in overall and recurrence-free survival.
  • Longer bisphosphonate exposure (3 years) correlated with consistent survival benefits.
  • Fracture incidence was higher in bisphosphonate users, but older patients showed potential protective effects against fractures.

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant bisphosphonates (BPs) improve survival in early breast cancer (EBC), particularly among postmenopausal women.However, in Korea, BPs are primarily reimbursed for osteoporosis, limiting their application as adjuvant cancer therapy.This nationwide real-world study aimed to evaluate the impact of BP use on survival and fracture outcomes in Korean women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) EBC. Methods:We identified 52,599 women diagnosed with HR+ EBC between 2012 and 2019 from the Korea Central Cancer Registry, who underwent surgery and initiated endocrine therapy.BP users (n=4,800) were defined as those prescribed BPs for 1-year post-diagnosis.Outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), fracture incidence, and fracture-free survival (FFS).Multivariate Cox models incorporating age stratifications and landmark analyses were further applied.Findings: BP use was significantly associated with improved OS.Although the overall RFS was not significant, patients aged 60 years showed significant improvements in both OS and RFS.Longer BP exposure (3 years) demonstrated consistent OS benefits across the 1-, 2-, and 3-year landmark analyses.Although fractures were higher in BP users, reflecting confounding by indication, age-stratified FFS suggested a potential protective effect against fractures in older patients (73 years).Interpretation: BP therapy was associated with improved OS and age-dependent (60 years) benefits in HR+ EBC.Despite higher fracture rates in BP users, age-stratified analyses suggest a fracturepreventive signal in older patients.These findings support adjuvant BP use in selected postmenopausal/high-risk subgroups.Prospective studies are needed to optimize BP timing and duration in this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf86ecf665edcd009e90d8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104767
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bisphosphonate Use and Reduced All-Cause Mortality in Korean Women Older than 50 Years: A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study2025
  2. 2Relationship between bisphosphonate use and risks of recurrence and mortality among hormone receptor–positive and triple‐negative breast cancer patients2026
  3. 3Bisphosphonates in breast cancer radiotherapy: associations with skeletal complications and treatment outcomes - a retrospective cohort study2026
  4. 4Health and adverse events associated with extended oral bisphosphonates among postmenopausal women: a systematic review2026
  5. 5Investigation of Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteoporosis: A Single‐Center Cross‐Sectional Study2026