PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026BMC Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Low handgrip strength, GLIM-defined malnutrition, or their coexistence: which has the greatest impact on health-related quality of life in patients with cancer?

View Full Paper
ASAna Maria de SouzaMSMaria Cláudia Bernardes Spexoto

Key Points

  • To examine the relative impacts of GLIM-defined malnutrition and low handgrip strength on health-related quality of life in cancer patients.
  • Cross-sectional study involving adult patients with cancer
  • Collected sociodemographic, clinical, lifestyle, and anthropometric information
  • Defined malnutrition based on GLIM criteria and assessed handgrip strength
  • Evaluated health-related quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-C30
  • Used nonparametric methods for group differences and general linear models for associations.
  • Low handgrip strength had stronger associations with functional and symptom scales compared to malnutrition alone.
  • Coexistence of malnutrition and low handgrip strength significantly reduced physical, role, and emotional functioning scores.
  • Coexistence was linked to higher fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, and appetite loss.

Abstract

Malnutrition and reduced muscle strength are prevalent among patients with cancer and are both linked to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although the individual impacts of these conditions are well documented, their combined effect remains insufficiently explored. This study aimed to examine how coexisting GLIM-defined malnutrition and low handgrip strength (HGS) affect HRQoL. This-cross-sectional study (November 2024-June 2025) involved adult patients with cancer undergoing clinical treatment. Sociodemographic, clinical, lifestyle, and anthropometric information was collected. Malnutrition was defined according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, and low HGS was used as a marker of reduced muscle strength. Coexistence was characterized by the simultaneous presence of malnutrition and low HGS. HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (0–100 scores), where higher functional scores indicate better HRQoL and higher symptom scores indicate greater symptom burden. Continuous variables were summarized as medians and interquartile ranges, and group differences were tested with nonparametric methods. Adjusted associations were examined using univariate general linear models, expressed as adjusted mean differences (Δ) and effect sizes (partial eta-squared, ₏^2). Statistical significance was set at p < 0. 05. After adjustment, low HGS showed significant and stronger associations with all functional scales and most symptom scales, whereas GLIM-defined malnutrition alone remained associated only with appetite loss. The coexistence of malnutrition and low HGS was associated with poorer physical (Δ = -35. 1; p = 0. 002; ₏^2 = 0. 240), role (Δ = -40. 3; p = 0. 014; ₏^2= 0. 216), and emotional functioning (Δ = -27. 7; p = 0. 044; ₏^2 = 0. 125). Coexistence was also associated with higher levels of fatigue (Δ = 37. 9; p < 0. 01; ₏^2= 0. 201), nausea and vomiting (Δ = 29. 5; p ≤ 0. 020; ₏^2= 0. 209), pain (Δ = 36. 0; p = 0. 027; ₏^2= 0. 134), dyspnea (Δ = 18. 0; p = 0. 042; ₏^2= 0. 132), and appetite loss (Δ = 39. 6; p = 0. 015; ₏^2= 0. 132). The coexistence of GLIM-defined malnutrition and low HGS is associated with poorer HRQoL in patients with cancer, with low handgrip strength being particularly relevant to HRQoL impairment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Souza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c08bcaa48f6b84677f97bdhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15823-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper