PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

C_ Unified Governability Framework for Human and Artificial Collective Systems (ECA)

View Full Paper
WLWilson John Sterking LAURET

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the governability of complex collective systems, focusing on internal constraints rather than external controls.
  • Developed a formal framework based on crowd-based dynamics and endogenously-constrained AI principles.
  • Modeled collective systems as evolving structures driven by interaction dynamics and memory effects.
  • Examined conditions for system governability, regime transitions, and collapse.
  • Applied concepts of attractor dynamics and structural limitations to define governability.
  • Established governability as emerging from a system's internal organization.
  • Identified internal saturation and informational tipping as critical factors in stability and collapse.
  • Highlighted the role of structural constraints in limiting intervention and enhancing system auditability.

Abstract

This document presents a unified formal framework for the analysis of governability in complex collective systems, with a specific focus on endogenously-constrained artificial and human systems. The approach is grounded in the principles of Crowd-Based Dynamics (CBD) and extends them toward a structurally closed model of governability consistent with the Endogenously-Constrained AI (ECA) paradigm. Within this framework, governability is not imposed through external control but emerges from internal structural constraints that regulate system evolution. Collective systems are modeled as dynamically evolving structures driven by accumulation, memory effects, and interaction dynamics, where stability and instability arise from endogenous processes rather than external intervention. The model formalizes the conditions under which a system remains governable, transitions between regimes, or collapses due to internal saturation, informational tipping, and structural limitations. It introduces a non-predictive, structurally deterministic approach based on attractor dynamics, memory weighting, and constrained accessibility of system states. Key mechanisms include: endogenous constraint of system trajectories, memory-driven asymmetry and attractor dominance, internal regulation of accessible configurations, structural limits to reversibility and control. The framework defines governability as a bounded regime emerging from the system’s own internal organization, where intervention capacity is intrinsically limited by structural saturation and informational constraints. This approach is particularly relevant for artificial intelligence systems, where stability, auditability, and control must be ensured without reliance on external corrective mechanisms. It provides a formal basis for designing systems that remain stable and governable through their internal architecture. The framework is also applicable to financial systems and broader complex adaptive environments, offering a unified perspective on systemic risk, regime transitions, and endogenous collapse. The contribution of this work lies in establishing a mathematically grounded, non-speculative model of governability in which control is not externally enforced but structurally embedded within the system itself.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilson John Sterking LAURET (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0ddb8fddb9876e79c1110https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper