PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026Obstetrics and Gynecology0 citations

Uterine Evacuation in the Setting of Transabdominal Cerclage

View Full Paper
JKJ. KlugmanUniversity of ChicagoCJC. JohnsonUniversity of ChicagoKRK. RivlinUniversity of Chicago

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify demographic and clinical variables, surgical techniques, and outcomes for uterine evacuation in patients with transabdominal cerclage.
  • Case series of patients undergoing uterine evacuation with transabdominal cerclage from March 2018 to August 2025.
  • Data on gestational duration, indication, surgical technique, and outcomes were collected through chart review.
  • Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
  • Twelve procedures were included, with a mean gestational duration of 12 weeks.
  • D&C was performed in 58% of cases and D&E in 42%.
  • Average estimated blood loss was 30 cc for D&C and 230 cc for D&E.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cervical insufficiency is associated with preterm delivery and recurrent pregnancy loss. Transabdominal cerclage, a more effective treatment alternative to transvaginal cerclage with >90% efficacy in preventing preterm delivery, is also permanent and requires delivery by cesarean. Patients with a transabdominal cerclage may require uterine evacuation via dilation and curettage (D In addition to laminaria, two received mifepristone, and one received misoprostol and mifepristone. Mean preoperative cervical dilation achieved was 1 cm (range 0.5–1.5 cm). Four patients required additional intraoperative dilation, up to 59 French. Mean EBL was 230 cc (range 50–600 cc), and mean operative time was 45 minutes (range 16–92). Both 20-week procedures were prolonged by challenging cervical dilation (80 and 92 minutes). One 20-week D&E had two complications: a superficial posterior cervical laceration and delayed retained products requiring hysteroscopic removal. CONCLUSIONS: We describe D&C and D&E techniques and outcomes in patients with transabdominal cerclage. Our findings support the safety and feasibility of utilizing standard practices for cervical preparation with transabdominal cerclage in place, which can reassure clinicians and patients. Compared with more invasive alternatives such as hysterotomy or cerclage removal, D&C and D&E with experienced surgeons offer a feasible, lower morbidity alternative. However, the prolonged operative time and complications described in both 20-week D&Es highlight the need for more data at more advanced gestations.Table 1

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klugman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0de74fddb9876e79c1324https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006211.50
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Successful outcome of transabdominal cerclage following two incidences of unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage: A case report in a multigravida with six previous mid-trimester miscarriages2025
  2. 2Comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes after emergency and elective cerclage: A systematic review and meta-analysis2025
  3. 3A multicenter analysis of 1364 elective/rescue cerclages in Brazil: Perinatal outcomes, complications, and the role of vaginal progesterone2026
  4. 4Clinical observation on 184 cases of transvaginal cervical cerclage2024
  5. 5Predictive factors for emergency cervical cerclage efficacy in singleton and twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study2025