PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2026Revista de investigaci�n Cl�nica0 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of a predictive model for the lifetime risk of end-stage kidney disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

View Full Paper
JAJuan Jose Aguilar-Lugo-GerezPRPamela Rivero-GarcíaDCDiego Luis Carrillo-Pérez

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a model predicting the risk of end-stage kidney disease by age 80 in class 1 ADPKD patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 142 adults with class 1 ADPKD
  • Total kidney volume measured by the ellipsoid method
  • eGFR calculated using CKD-EPI 2021
  • Data divided into derivation and validation sets
  • Performance compared against the Mayo Clinic predictive model and a Cox model.
  • Achieved adjusted R2 of 0.858 in validation (vs. 0.830 for MCPM)
  • C-index for ESKD prediction was 0.94, comparable to Cox model's C-index of 0.95
  • Demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration for risk prediction.

Abstract

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading monogenic cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Because disease-modifying therapy is costly and can cause adverse effects, identifying patients most likely to benefit is essential. We developed and internally validated a model to predict ESKD by age 80 in class 1 ADPKD, hypothesizing that combining baseline eGFR with an exponential estimate of kidney growth would improve forecasting. We retrospectively analyzed 142 adults with class 1 ADPKD followed at a tertiary center in Mexico City (2012–2023). Total kidney volume (TKV) was measured by the ellipsoid method and eGFR by CKD-EPI 2021. Data were split 50/50 into derivation and validation sets. Future eGFR was modeled using baseline eGFR plus an exponential TKV growth surrogate; ESKD risk (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) was derived from the standard normal cumulative distribution. Performance was compared with the Mayo Clinic Predictive Model (MCPM) and a Cox model. In validation, the model achieved adjusted R 2 = 0.858 (vs. 0.830 for MCPM). ESKD prediction showed excellent discrimination (C-index = 0.94) and calibration, comparable to Cox (C-index = 0.95). This approach supports individualized lifetime ESKD risk prediction in class 1 ADPKD to guide targeted therapy and resource allocation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aguilar-Lugo-Gerez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0df0bfddb9876e79c161bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ric.2026.100038
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper