PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2026European Respiratory Journal0 citations

The antitussive pentoxyverine (POV) has a low proarrhythmic risk based on an in vitro and in vivo integrated risk assessment

View Full Paper
TWThomas WeiserBGBrian GuthGRGeorg Rast

Key Result

Pentoxyverine demonstrated a very low proarrhythmic risk based on QT prolongation at therapeutic doses, with only a slight (~5%) QT prolongation observed at 12 uM in vivo.

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the proarrhythmic potential of pentoxyverine beyond just hERG channel inhibition.
  • Conducted in vitro assays with manual patch clamp for hERG channel inhibition.
  • Analyzed action potential duration in guinea pig heart muscle at varying pentoxyverine concentrations.
  • Performed in vivo studies on Beagle dogs with escalating doses of pentoxyverine via intravenous infusion.
  • Measured heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular pressure changes, and ECG responses.
  • Pentoxyverine inhibited hERG channels with an IC50 of 13.8 uM.
  • APD prolonged only slightly (∼3%) at low doses and reduced (∼20%) at higher doses.
  • QT-interval showed minimal change (∼5%) at 12 uM, with severe effects at higher concentrations.
  • Proarrhythmic risk with therapeutic doses is considered very low based on collected in vitro and in vivo data.

Structured PICO

Does pentoxyverine pose a proarrhythmic risk in preclinical models?

P
Population
Preclinical models: hERG channels (in vitro), guinea pig papillary muscle (in vitro), and anaesthetized Beagle dogs (in vivo)
I
Intervention
Pentoxyverine (POV) in vitro (up to 10 uM) and in vivo via intravenous infusion (1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg escalating dose)
O
Outcome
Proarrhythmic risk assessed by hERG channel inhibition, action potential duration (APD), and QT-interval prolongationsafety

Pentoxyverine demonstrates a very low proarrhythmic risk at therapeutic doses based on integrated in vitro and in vivo preclinical models.

Abstract

Our study investigated POV-induced effects in various preclinical models, since potency for blocking hERG channels alone is not sufficient to assess its proarrhythmic potential. POV inhibited hERG channels with an IC 50 of 13.8 uM using a manual patch clamp assay. Action potential duration (APD) in the guinea pig papillary muscle was prolonged minimally by ∼3% at 1 uM but then was reduced by ∼20% at 10 uM. Thus, the in vitro data suggest that concentrations that could cause hERG-mediated APD prolongation are associated with other effects that lead to a substantial APD shortening. The effect of POV on the QT-interval was investigated in anaesthetized Beagle dogs using intravenous infusion of 1, 3, 10 and finally 30 mg/kg using an escalating dose design. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), max. value of the first derivative of the left ventricular pressure (LVdP/dtmax), as well as the ECG were measured and related to plasma drug levels. The step-wise infusions lead to POV plasma concentrations of 0.63, 2.1, 12.2 and 108 uM at the end of each dose step. HR was held constant with pacing. BP was reduced starting at POV concentrations >12.2 uM. Only a slight (∼5%) prolongation of the QT-interval was observed at 12 uM but higher concentrations led to an exposure-dependent and ultimately fatal drop in BP and LVdP/dtmax. Our data show that POV does not affect the QT interval relevantly up to the highest tolerable concentration in the in vivo model used. Based on all available data, both in vitro and in vivo , the proarrhythmic risk based on QT prolongation with therapeutic doses of POV (mean C max in man @ 30 mg appr. 0.14 uM) is considered very low.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weiser et al. (2014) studied Proarrhythmic risk. Pentoxyverine (POV) was evaluated on QT-interval prolongation. Pentoxyverine demonstrated a very low proarrhythmic risk based on QT prolongation at therapeutic doses, with only a slight (~5%) QT prolongation observed at 12 uM in vivo.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c22975aeb5a845df0d3f9chttps://doi.org/10.1183/13993003/erj.44.suppl_58.p581
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper