PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Nature Communications1 citationsOpen Access

RF-SIRF reveals a replication stress-specific epigenetic code by spatio-temporal mapping of reversed forks

SRSunetra RoyMFMorgan M. FimreiteYCYue Chen

Key Points

  • To explore the role of reversed forks during DNA replication stress and to develop a method for mapping their characteristics.
  • Developed RF-SIRF for single-cell resolution mapping of reversed forks.
  • Conducted spatial and temporal analyses of reversed forks during the cell cycle.
  • Utilized proteomic approaches to identify associated proteins.
  • Reversed forks are localized at the nuclear periphery during S-phase.
  • Identified a distinct epigenetic landscape associated with reversed forks.
  • Showed unique recruitment patterns for DNA stress response proteins.

Abstract

DNA replication stress responses are guardians of genomic stability critical during development, hematopoiesis, cancer therapy response, aging and disease suppression. Central to these responses are reversed forks (RF), which are distinct four-way DNA structures formed during DNA replication stalling to protect against toxic DNA lesions. Historically, RF detection relies on specialized electron microscopy, precluding studies within their native cellular context. By harnessing intrinsic bio-physical properties of RFs, we here present a quantitative method to map RFs with single-cell resolution (RF-SIRF). RF-SIRF reveals that RFs accumulate at the nuclear periphery during early-mid S-phase of the cell cycle. Crucially, RFs possess a specialized chromatin landscape and utilize an epigenetic replication stress code distinct from transcription, explaining the selective recruitment of DNA stress response proteins to RFs. Collectively, RF-SIRF enables robust quantitative, temporal, spatial and proteomic analyses of reversed forks, empowering advanced cellular and medical investigations of DNA replication stress responses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37aa8b34aaaeb1a67c779https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70716-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1DNA fork remodeling proteins, Zranb3 and Smarcal1, are uniquely essential for aging hematopoiesis2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Strand annealing and motor driven activities of SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 are stimulated by RAD51 and the paralog complex2022 · 46 citations
  3. 3RecJ exonuclease: substrates, products and interaction with SSB2006 · 133 citations
  4. 4Stabilization of Reversed Replication Forks by Telomerase Drives Telomere Catastrophe2017 · 116 citations
  5. 5HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis2020 · 202 citations