PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026BMJ Global Health2 citationsOpen Access

From harm to healing: transforming the lives of victims of conflict-related sexual violence through reparation

View Full Paper
SGSunneva GilmoreCSClara Sandoval-Villalba

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how reparations can address the harms caused by conflict-related sexual violence and improve victims' lives.
  • Analysis of existing literature on CRSV and its health impacts
  • Review of reparation processes and frameworks
  • Evaluation of domestic reparation programs and their effectiveness
  • Reparations significantly improve victims' mental and physical health outcomes.
  • Effective programs are timely, participatory, and incorporate monetary and rehabilitation measures.
  • Clear institutional reforms are essential to prevent future violations.

Abstract

Conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) generates devastating harms that affect the individual victim (female, male, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer and inclusive of other orientations (LGBTIQ+), disabled, young and elderly), families, communities and the whole fabric of society. CRSV is a public health concern as it can lead to health consequences including physical, psychosocial and stigma-related harms that are exacerbated by a lack of healthcare infrastructure. There has been some progress on understanding the harm, but data gaps prevail due to practical reasons, definitional problems and stigma. When violations of human rights or humanitarian law take place, diverse harms can occur, and victims have a right to reparation as enshrined in international law. Reparation aims to address, as far as possible, the multiple harms victims suffer and to positively transform their lives. The right to reparation is fulfilled through a victim-centred process and delivered via appropriate forms of reparation: restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction measures and guarantees of non-repetition. When implemented in a timely, participatory and inclusive manner, reparations can have a transformative impact on victims of CRSV. The process should be prompt and combined with individual monetary and rehabilitation measures alongside clear institutional and societal reforms to ensure the non-repetition of such violations. Domestic reparation programmes, fully supported by government and other stakeholders such as health professionals, offer the most sustainable framework for achieving these goals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gilmore et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37aa8b34aaaeb1a67c786https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper