PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

Community-Driven ESG Governance and Climate-Resilient Livelihoods in Ghana: Evidence from Participatory Action Research

View Full Paper
EEEsi Abbam ElliotNONana Opare-DjanMIMustapha Iddrisu

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine how community-driven governance can enhance environmental and economic outcomes in Ghana.
  • Employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.
  • Conducted quantitative difference-in-differences analysis followed by qualitative case analysis.
  • Utilized Participatory Action Research to engage the community.
  • Combined vocational training, financial literacy, and environmental governance in the program.
  • Community-driven governance significantly reduced illegal mining participation.
  • Strengthened women's economic agency and improved livelihoods.
  • Enhanced adoption of climate-smart practices among community members.
  • Developed transparent composite indices to measure ESG outcomes effectively.

Abstract

Illegal artisanal and small-scale mining (galamsey) and climate stress jointly degrade ecosystems and livelihoods in Ghana. This paper demonstrates how community-driven governance can realign incentives toward environmental stewardship and inclusive livelihoods. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design—quantitative difference-in-differences followed by qualitative case analysis and Participatory Action Research—we evaluate a structured program combining vocational training, financial literacy, environmental stewardship, and governance alignment. We operationalize Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) outcomes via transparent composite indices and triangulate survey, administrative, and focus group evidence. The study identifies conditions under which alternative livelihoods reduce participation in illegal mining, strengthen women’s economic agency, and improve adoption of climate-smart practices. Implications include practical guidance for program design (community delivery, matched incentives, oversight), policy (local climate finance and accountability mechanisms), and research (scalable indicators and rigorous impact evaluation in resource-dependent communities).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elliot et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37afeb34aaaeb1a67cffdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18063139
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper