PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Peer Community In Archaeology0 citationsOpen Access

Decision Revise: Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. Round#1

QDQuentin DrillatGhent University HospitalKRKillian Regnier

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of different software options for archaeological field documentation.
  • Evaluated software tools: iDig, ODK, QField
  • Analyzed functionalities and usability of each software
  • Recommended best practices for field documentation processes
  • Identified key advantages of QField over iDig and ODK
  • Suggested improved workflows for archaeological documentation
  • Highlight differences in user experience and efficiency among the software

Abstract

A recommendation of: Kyriakos Sgouropoulos, Periklis Chrysafakoglou, Ilias Ladenis Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19054070

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Drillat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b33b34aaaeb1a67d5fahttps://doi.org/10.24072/pci.archaeo.100696.d1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper