PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Buildings2 citationsOpen Access

From Space to Well-Being: Understanding the Restorative Potential of Urban Riverfront Landscapes

View Full Paper
SWSulan WuQLQingqing LiNanjing Forestry UniversityYWYuChen WuMacau University of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how different qualities of urban riverfronts impact residents' well-being.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional survey with 551 residents along the Yangtze Riverfront.
  • Utilized a 96-item questionnaire assessing spatial perception and well-being.
  • Employed structural equation modeling to analyze relationships among variables.
  • Spatial perception positively correlates with perceived restorativeness.
  • Aesthetic perception contributes most significantly to perceived restorativeness.
  • Higher perceived restorativeness leads to better subjective well-being.
  • Environmental sensitivity enhances the restorative benefits experienced by individuals.

Abstract

Urban riverfronts, as integral components of the urban built environment, serve as essential blue–green infrastructure that offers restorative opportunities to residents in high-density areas. However, the mechanisms through which specific spatial qualities influence well-being outcomes remain underexplored. Guided by Attention Restoration Theory (ART) and Stress Recovery Theory (SRT), this study investigates the associations among spatial perception, perceived restorativeness, environmental sensitivity, and subjective well-being along the Yangtze Riverfront in Nanjing, China. A cross-sectional survey (N = 551) was conducted across six riverfront segments, using a 96-item questionnaire to assess five spatial perception dimensions, four restorativeness dimensions, and four well-being dimensions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results indicate that spatial perception is positively associated with perceived restorativeness (β = 0.320, p < 0.001), with aesthetic perception demonstrating the strongest relative contribution (β = 0.265). Perceived restorativeness, in turn, significantly contributes to well-being (β = 0.540, p < 0.001), partially mediating the relationship between spatial perception and well-being (indirect effect (β = 0.173; 41.69% of total effect). Notably, environmental sensitivity moderated the spatial–restorative link (β = 0.799, p < 0.001), with restorative benefits being significantly amplified for individuals with higher sensitivity. These findings highlight aesthetics, accessibility, and perceived safety as priority targets for urban design. This study offers actionable insights for optimizing riverfront landscapes as vital urban health resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37ba2b34aaaeb1a67e3f3https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061235
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimization of Hunhe waterfront parks in Shenyang based on Attention Restoration Theory2025
  2. 2An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Bridging landscape and perceived restorativeness: an empirical study of greenways along the Grand Canal, Hangzhou2026
  4. 4How Do Waterfront Concert Halls in China Enhance Residents’ Well-Being? The Chain Mediating Effects of Perceived Restorativeness and Place Attachment2026 · 3 citations
  5. 5Restoration Outcome, Perceived Environmental Quality, and Greenspace Characteristics: A Path Analysis of Human-Nature Interaction2026