PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Prehospital and Disaster Medicine0 citations

The Development of a Citizen Disaster Preparedness Training Program

View Full Paper
YYYao Qun YeongBDBalpreet Kaur DhillonYLYin Ting Liau

Key Points

  • The goal is to develop a training program that empowers laypersons to effectively respond to mass casualty incidents.
  • Developed the course 'Ground Zero' using Kern’s 6-step curriculum approach.
  • Included core content on scene safety, triage, communication, and lifesaving procedures.
  • Conducted online and in-person training sessions with hands-on practice and simulated MCIs.
  • Gathered participant feedback through online forms and assessed learning via pre- and post-session quizzes.
  • Successfully developed a course tailored for laypersons to enhance disaster response skills.
  • Identified challenges in training delivery, especially during COVID-19 restrictions.
  • Participants showed increased confidence and understanding of MCI principles after the training.

Abstract

Summary: Mass casualty incidents (MCI) stress systems. Research shows the critical role laypersons play in saving lives and reducing morbidity by providing time-sensitive interventions at a disaster scene. While many first-aid and basic life support courses exist, training for laypersons to respond to disasters is few. A course, “Ground Zero,” was developed by Disaster Volunteer Corps, Singapore General Hospital, for laypersons focusing on basic disaster management and simple lifesaving interventions. This review aims to detail the methods of course development and challenges faced in this pilot program. Kern’s 6-step approach was undertaken for curriculum development. Core content for Ground Zero included scene safety, triage, emergency communications, and principles for basic lifesaving procedures. Emergency physicians supervised Emergency Medicine residents and trained students who conducted the sessions. Course feedback was sought through online forms. Pre- and post-session quizzes were undertaken to assess the learning and confidence of the participants. (Key challenges faced) • Implementation: Phase 1 was delivered online with breakout sessions, due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Phase 2 was delivered in person, with sessions centering around hands-on practice, and culminating with a simulated MCI, with scene safety, assessment and intervention, and evacuation of casualties undertaken by participants. • Understanding: the course needed to address disaster response from the layperson’s perspective. MCI principles needed to be simplified, and the limitations of life-saving measures in MCIs had to be addressed sensitively. Citizens have differing levels of baseline medical understanding and willingness to intervene. Focus stayed on empowering and not endangering them in their efforts. The importance of alignment with emergency systems was also taught. Previous studies demonstrate the willingness of laypersons to respond to disaster scenarios. However, there is a lack of training in this area. Education remains a cornerstone in disaster readiness. Further training and research need to be conducted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yeong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37ba2b34aaaeb1a67e3fahttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x26103367
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper