PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Administrative Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Mapping European Countries’ Resilience to Cognitive Warfare

View Full Paper
CDCostel Marian DalbanAlexandru Ioan Cuza UniversityECEcaterina ComanTransylvania University of BrașovVBVlad Bătrânu-PințeaTransylvania University of Brașov

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the resilience of European countries to cognitive warfare through a composite measure.
  • Developed a cross-national composite measure of resilience.
  • Integrated three pillars: information ecology, institutional-digital capacity, and socioeconomic context.
  • Collected publicly available secondary indicators from EU and EEA states.
  • Conducted descriptive analysis, association testing, and multivariate modelling.
  • Applied dimensionality reduction and unsupervised clustering for country typology.
  • Resilience correlates strongly with institutional capacity and governance performance.
  • Healthy information ecology reinforces resilience.
  • Digital infrastructure is vital but insufficient without capable institutions.
  • Socioeconomic vulnerabilities increase susceptibility to cognitive threats.

Abstract

This study maps European countries’ resilience to cognitive warfare by developing a cross-national composite measure. The framework integrates three pillars: information ecology, institutional-digital capacity, and socioeconomic context—drawing on a systemic perspective linking social structures to societal functions. Publicly available secondary indicators are compiled from online sources for EU (European Union) and EEA (European Economics Area) states. The dataset is examined through descriptive analysis, association testing, multivariate modelling, dimensionality reduction to derive a composite resilience score, and unsupervised clustering to produce a country typology. Indicators capture governance effectiveness, e-government maturity, public-sector AI (Artificial Intelligence) readiness, digital connectivity and infrastructure, media freedom and broader media-ecosystem quality, academic freedom, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities such as youth labour market exclusion. Results show that resilience aligns most strongly with institutional capacity and governance performance; a healthy ecology acts as a reinforcing layer. Digital infrastructure appears necessary but insufficient without capable, credible institutions and coherent public policy. Socioeconomic vulnerabilities tend to erode resilience and heighten susceptibility to hostile cognitive influence. The study concludes that policy efforts should prioritise governance integrity and effectiveness, end-to-end digital government, responsible public-sector AI capability, and safeguards for media and academic autonomy, alongside measures that improve youth inclusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dalban et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37be2b34aaaeb1a67eb13https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16030160
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper