PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Trans-Kambin Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Low Neurostimulation Threshold and Transient Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Changes Without Postoperative Neurological Deficits

View Full Paper
PSPraveen SaxenaHAHamidreza AbbasiARAbdul Rauf

Key Points

  • To investigate the clinical implications of low neurostimulation thresholds during trans-Kambin OLLIF and their relationship to postoperative outcomes.
  • Descriptive case report of a single patient undergoing L5-S1 trans-Kambin OLLIF.
  • Utilized intraoperative neuromonitoring to assess neural activity during surgical procedures.
  • Monitored triggered EMG, motor evoked potentials, and somatosensory evoked potentials during the procedure.
  • Triggered EMG responses were noted at 2 mA near neural elements during surgery.
  • An approximately 80% reduction in left L5 MEP amplitude was observed post cage positioning, persisting until extubation.
  • The patient demonstrated no neurological deficits post-extubation, remaining neurologically intact at follow-up.

Abstract

Trans-Kambin oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) is a minimally invasive lumbar fusion technique that relies heavily on intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) to reduce the risk of neural injury. Triggered electromyography (tEMG) stimulation thresholds below 3-4 mA are traditionally considered to indicate increased neural risk; however, the clinical implications of isolated low thresholds remain incompletely defined. We report the case of a 44-year-old female who underwent L5-S1 trans-Kambin OLLIF. During probe placement, triggered EMG responses were elicited at 2 mA, indicating close proximity to neural elements. Free-run EMG remained quiet, and baseline motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were stable during dilation and cage insertion. Approximately 10 minutes after final cage positioning, an ~80% reduction in left L5 MEP amplitude occurred, which persisted until extubation. Despite these transient IONM changes, post-extubation neurological examination was normal, with no motor or sensory deficits. The patient remained neurologically intact at follow-up with improvement in preoperative symptoms. This case demonstrates that isolated low neurostimulation thresholds and transient IONM changes do not inevitably predict postoperative neurological deficit, highlighting the importance of interpreting multimodal neuromonitoring in the clinical context and emphasizing that patient-specific risk-benefit analysis and surgical judgment remain paramount.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saxena et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cc69fdc3bde4489178e0https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.105724
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper